Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rumpke Waste & Recycling » RUM1768350699

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RUM1768350699)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-209
Company Score Before Incident716 / 1000
Company Score After Incident507 / 1000
Company LinkView Rumpke Waste & Recycling Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERRUM1768350699
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED3 terabytes
INCIDENT DATE12/01/2026
STATUSCompleted (no evidence of data misuse found)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rumpke Waste & Recycling's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rumpke Waste & Recycling Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rumpke Waste & Recycling breach identified under incident ID RUM1768350699.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rumpke Waste & Recycling's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rumpke, the number of followers: 14699, the industry type: Environmental Services and the number of employees: 1641 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 716 and after the incident was 507 with a difference of -209 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rumpke Waste & Recycling and their customers.

Rumpke recently reported "Rumpke settles lawsuit over employee data stolen in cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Rumpke is settling a class-action lawsuit after several employees allege a cyberattack stole terabytes of their information from company servers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 3 terabytes, with nearly 17000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of 750000.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement via senior vice president for communications.

The case underscores how Completed (no evidence of data misuse found), teams are taking away lessons such as Failure to implement reasonable cybersecurity measures and delayed detection of malicious activity, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Public statement confirming customer payment information was not impacted.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack detected after ransom demands were made. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack that exposed terabytes of sensitive data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers and other identifying details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised the personal information of nearly 17,000 employees and Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 3 terabytes of data stolen from company servers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating over 3 terabytes of data taken during the breach. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack that exposed terabytes of sensitive data and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack detected after ransom demands were made. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating delayed detection of malicious activity. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Cloud Storage (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (50%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)

Sources & References