Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Royal Media Partners » RANCONROY1768390960

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RANCONROY1768390960)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-346
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident404 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERRANCONROY1768390960
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE06/08/2025
STATUSDisrupted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Royal Media Partners's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Royal Media Partners Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Royal Media Partners breach identified under incident ID RANCONROY1768390960.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Royal Media Partners's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/royal-media-partners, the number of followers: 1499, the industry type: Advertising Services and the number of employees: 31 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 404 with a difference of -346 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Royal Media Partners and their customers.

On 08 August 2024, a cybersecurity incident called "BlackSuit and Royal Ransomware Operations Disrupted" came to light.

The Russian cybercrime group behind BlackSuit and Royal ransomware was prolific in extorting payments from victims across multiple sectors.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of $370 million in ransom payments.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Seizure and dismantling of technical infrastructure (servers, domains, tools).

The case underscores how Disrupted.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating targeted healthcare, education, public safety, energy, and government sectors and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating russian-linked ransomware group responsible for extorting over $370 million. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware deployment, extortion, and money laundering and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating tools used for ransomware deployment (implied by infrastructure seizure). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating former members rebranding under subgroups like Zeon, Black Basta, and Quantum and Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating infrastructure used for ransomware deployment (servers, domains). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating targeted critical infrastructure sectors (healthcare, energy, government). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rebranding from Conti to BlackSuit to evade detection and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating tools used for ransomware deployment (implied by takedown). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating extortion demands exceeded $500 million (implied credential abuse) and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating former Conti members rebranding (implied access to credentials). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption and extortion (implied discovery of sensitive data). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating targeted multiple sectors (implied lateral movement across networks). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating extorting over $370 million from 450+ U.S. victims. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating leak site was seized (implied C2 infrastructure) and Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography (T1573.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware deployment and extortion (implied encrypted C2). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating extortion demands exceeded $500 million (implied data exfiltration). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption such as Yes,ransomware strain such as BlackSuit, Royal and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating targeted critical infrastructure (healthcare, energy, government). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (60%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (50%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (70%)
Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Service Stop (70%)

Sources & References