Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rocky View County » ROC3105831112725

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ROC3105831112725)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-75
Company Score Before Incident762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident687 / 1000
Company LinkView Rocky View County Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERROC3105831112725
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORcompromised corporate support account
DATA EXPOSEDstudent ID numbers, encrypted passwords,...
INCIDENT DATE30/11/2024
STATUScompleted (PowerSchool and RVS investigations; regulatory report received)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rocky View County's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rocky View County Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rocky View County breach identified under incident ID ROC3105831112725.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rocky View County's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rocky-view-county, the number of followers: 6005, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 351 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -75 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rocky View County and their customers.

On 28 December 2024, Rocky View Schools (RVS) disclosed data breach and unauthorized access issues under the banner "PowerSchool Data Breach Affecting Rocky View Schools (RVS)".

On December 28, 2024, PowerSchool, a cloud-based student information system, informed Rocky View Schools (RVS) of a data breach by an unauthorized party that impacted several school divisions in North America.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting PowerSchool Student Information System, and exposing student ID numbers, encrypted passwords and dates of birth.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like data deletion confirmed by PowerSchool and no further replication/dissemination, and began remediation that includes multi-factor authentication, network firewalls and access control policies, while recovery efforts such as system remained functional and identity/credit monitoring services (Experian, TransUnion) extended to July 31, 2025 continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through public statements by RVS, advisories on RVS/PowerSchool websites and direct notification to affected individuals.

The case underscores how completed (PowerSchool and RVS investigations; regulatory report received), teams are taking away lessons such as Importance of securing corporate support accounts to prevent unauthorized access, Proactive monitoring (e.g., dark web) can help confirm data deletion and prevent misuse and Offering identity protection services can mitigate reputational and operational risks, and recommending next steps like Enhance authentication mechanisms for high-privilege accounts (e.g., corporate support), Expand cybersecurity awareness training for students and staff to recognize phishing/extortion attempts and Implement continuous third-party security audits for cloud-based systems like PowerSchool, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering RVS website updates and PowerSchool customer notifications.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including compromised corporate support account (PowerSchool cloud system), and unauthorized party accessed via PowerSchool Student Information System. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating encrypted passwords accessed in breach and Account Discovery: Cloud Account (T1087.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised corporate support account used to access student/staff records. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating student ID numbers, dates of birth, addresses, student support information exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data was exfiltrated via PowerSchool cloud system (no evidence of C2), and no further replication/dissemination confirmed post-exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Extortion (T1659) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor attempted extortion using data from the December 2024 breach (May 2025). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating powerSchool asserted exfiltrated data was deleted post-breach. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Credentials (T1098.003) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating compromised corporate support account (potential for persistent access if not revoked immediately). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References