Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rocky Mountain Care » ROC1774758444

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ROC1774758444)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-177
Company Score Before Incident765 / 1000
Company Score After Incident588 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERROC1774758444
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access
DATA EXPOSEDPotential Protected Health Information (PHI)...
INCIDENT DATE29/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rocky Mountain Care's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rocky Mountain Care Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rocky Mountain Care breach identified under incident ID ROC1774758444.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rocky Mountain Care's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rocky-mountain-care, the number of followers: 2396, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 709 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 588 with a difference of -177 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rocky Mountain Care and their customers.

On 23 February 2026, Rocky Mountain Care disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Rocky Mountain Care Hit by Qilin Ransomware Attack, Exposing Sensitive Data".

Rocky Mountain Care, a Utah-based healthcare provider offering hospice, home care, skilled nursing, and rehabilitation services, suffered a cybersecurity breach between January 30 and February 2, 2026.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Potential Protected Health Information (PHI) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via Tor network and company statement.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals to be notified once review is complete.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the organization’s network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector described as Unauthorized access. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group Qilin claimed responsibility. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the organization’s network. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the organization’s network. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group Qilin claimed responsibility and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack threatening organizations existence. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potential exposure of PHI and PII. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the organization’s network and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potential Protected Health Information (PHI) compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potential Protected Health Information (PHI) and PII compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating threatening to publish stolen data on the dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating publicly disclosed on February 23, 2026, via the Tor network. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group Qilin claimed responsibility and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating publicly disclosed on February 23, 2026, via the Tor network. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Defacement (50%)

Sources & References