Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rockwell Automation » STRROC1775594506

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (STRROC1775594506)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-16
Company Score Before Incident794 / 1000
Company Score After Incident778 / 1000
Company LinkView Rockwell Automation Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSTRROC1775594506
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of internet-facing OT devices, manipulation of HMI and SCADA systems
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rockwell Automation's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rockwell Automation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rockwell Automation breach identified under incident ID STRROC1775594506.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rockwell Automation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rockwell-automation, the number of followers: 1167301, the industry type: Automation Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 21731 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 794 and after the incident was 778 with a difference of -16 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rockwell Automation and their customers.

Government services recently reported "U.S. Government Warns of Iranian Cyberattacks Targeting Critical Infrastructure", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Operational technology (OT) systems, PLCs, HMI, SCADA systems, plus an estimated financial loss of Yes.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exploited internet-facing OT devices, and vulnerability exploited such as Internet-facing OT devices and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating internet-facing OT devices targeted for initial access. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Manipulation of Control (T0855) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including manipulation of HMI and SCADA systems, and malicious interactions with project files in PLCs. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Loss of Control (T0880) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including operational disruptions in critical infrastructure sectors, and downtime such as Yes and Damage to Property (T0829) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating disruptive cyberattacks against American energy and water infrastructure. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Lateral Tool Transfer (T0866) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised at least 75 devices in earlier campaigns. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Manipulate ICS Control Equipment (T0860) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating manipulation of HMI and SCADA systems for disruptive impact. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal from Tools (T0826) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating iranian APT group conducting disruptive attacks. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
External Remote Services (80%)
Execution
Manipulation of Control (90%)
Impact
Loss of Control (95%)
Damage to Property (70%)
Lateral Movement
Lateral Tool Transfer (60%)
Persistence
Manipulate ICS Control Equipment (80%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal from Tools (50%)

Sources & References