Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rich Products Corporation » RIC1780360401

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RIC1780360401)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-52
Company Score Before Incident769 / 1000
Company Score After Incident717 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERRIC1780360401
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORPhishing
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, driver’s...
INCIDENT DATE12/11/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rich Products Corporation's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rich Products Corporation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rich Products Corporation breach identified under incident ID RIC1780360401.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rich Products Corporation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/richproducts, the number of followers: 249959, the industry type: Food and Beverage Manufacturing and the number of employees: 6158 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 769 and after the incident was 717 with a difference of -52 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rich Products Corporation and their customers.

On 22 April 2026, Rich Products Corporation disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Rich Products Corporation Data Breach via Third-Party Vendor".

Rich Products Corporation disclosed a data breach impacting approximately 200 individuals due to a cyberattack on its third-party vendor, First Advantage Corporation.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting First Advantage Corporation’s Drug & Occupational Health Screening Unit, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, driver’s license information, with nearly 200 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Disabled compromised account, and began remediation that includes Enhanced security measures, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Completed, teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights risks associated with third-party vendor vulnerabilities in supply chain security, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to affected individuals on April 22, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including sophisticated phishing attack, and attacker had accessed the account following a phishing attack and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack on First Advantage Corporation, a third-party provider. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution (T1204) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to an employee’s account. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including unauthorized access to an employee’s account, and compromised employee account. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection (T1114) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated the contents of the employee’s email inbox and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers, driver’s license information compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including exfiltrated the contents of the employee’s email inbox, and data breach impacting approximately 200 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of fraud or misuse of the compromised data has been identified. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Execution
User Execution (70%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Email Collection (90%)
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (50%)

Sources & References