Comparison Overview

ResultsCX

VS

TaskUs

ResultsCX

1700 Markley St, Suite 210, Norristown, Pennsylvania, US, 19401
Last Update: 2025-11-29
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://resultscx.com/

ResultsCX is a leading provider of transformational Customer Experience Management (CXM) solutions to 75+ global brands, including Fortune 100 and 500 companies. For 30+ years, we have been driving superior customer and business outcomes for brands across Healthcare, Media, Telecom, Fast Growth technology, Retail, Banking and Financial Services, and other industries. Our award-winning approach helps brands prioritize investments and build digitally influenced customer journeys, creating high-value impact across three areas: Revenue Acceleration, Cost Optimization, and Enhanced Experience. Supported by 23,000+ colleagues and 25+ engagement hubs worldwide, our innovative solutions and services solve persistent customer experience challenges, making life easier for millions of consumers.

NAICS: 541615
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TaskUs

1650 Independence Dr, None, New Braunfels, Texas, US, 78132
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649
https://www.taskus.com/

TaskUs is a different breed of BPO. We are a collective of highly capable humans, who understand how to deploy technology and data to best serve your purpose. From Digital CX to Trust & Safety, AI Services, Risk + Response, Consulting, and anything in between, we consider ourselves responsible for protecting our partners’ interests and supporting their long term success through innovation and technology - powered by ridiculously smart people. TaskUs partners with the world’s most innovative and disruptive brands to protect what matters most and to thrive in an ever changing world.

NAICS: 541615
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 36,825
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resultscx.jpeg
ResultsCX
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taskus.jpeg
TaskUs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ResultsCX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TaskUs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ResultsCX in 2025.

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TaskUs in 2025.

Incident History — ResultsCX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ResultsCX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TaskUs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TaskUs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resultscx.jpeg
ResultsCX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taskus.jpeg
TaskUs
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Bribed Employees), Social Engineering, Physical Data Theft (Photographing Sensitive Information)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Data Theft for Fraud/Resale)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ResultsCX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TaskUs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TaskUs company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ResultsCX company has not reported any.

In the current year, TaskUs company and ResultsCX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TaskUs company nor ResultsCX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TaskUs company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ResultsCX company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TaskUs company nor ResultsCX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ResultsCX company nor TaskUs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TaskUs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ResultsCX company.

TaskUs company employs more people globally than ResultsCX company, reflecting its scale as a Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ResultsCX nor TaskUs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References