Comparison Overview
Restaurant Brands Australia

Restaurant Brands Australia
Sydney, NSW, AU, 2009
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Restaurant Brands Australia is a corporate franchisee and specialises in managing multi-site branded food retail chains. Its restaurant support centre is located in Sydney, NSW. Restaurant Brands is listed on the New Zealand Stock Exchange under NZX code RBD and on the ...

Burger King
5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami, 33126, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its f...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Restaurant Brands Australia







Burger King






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Restaurant Brands Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.
Incident History - Restaurant Brands Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Restaurant Brands Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Restaurant Brands Australia

Burger King
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.