Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Renault GroupRenault Group
VS
Mercedes-Benz AGMercedes-Benz AG
Renault Group

Renault Group

122-122 bis avenue du Général Leclerc, Boulogne Billancourt Cedex, FR, 92100

Last Update: 12/05/2026

View Profile
598/1000Very Poor

Home of innovative talents across the world. Builders of a sustainable future, we are pioneering mobility since 1898.

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:52,647
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2
Mercedes-Benz AG

Mercedes-Benz AG

Am Wallgraben, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 70563

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

"Love of invention will never end." - Carl Benz Learn more about us as we continue to pioneer the future of driving excellence. Data privacy: mb4.me/provider_privacy Mercedes-Benz AG Mercedesstraße 120 70372 Stuttgart Germany Phone: +49 7 11 17-0 E-Mail: dialog@mer...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:47,742
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Renault Group

Renault Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercedes-Benz AG

Mercedes-Benz AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Renault Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercedes-Benz AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Renault Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Renault Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercedes-Benz AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercedes-Benz AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Renault Group

Renault Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EURRENAVI1775840291
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REN2632226100625
🔒 Incident : Breach
SKOJLRREN1778610419
Mercedes-Benz AG

Mercedes-Benz AG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MER71318423

FAQ

Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Renault Group company and Mercedes-Benz AG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Renault Group and Mercedes-Benz AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Renault Group and Mercedes-Benz AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Renault Group or Mercedes-Benz AG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Renault Group or Mercedes-Benz AG ?
Between Renault Group and Mercedes-Benz AG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Renault Group and Mercedes-Benz AG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2