Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Remarket Space » REM1764598512

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (REM1764598512)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-92
Company Score Before Incident767 / 1000
Company Score After Incident675 / 1000
Company LinkView Remarket Space Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERREM1764598512
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORExternal Hacking (AWS S3 Storage Compromise)
DATA EXPOSEDDriver’s license images (names, dates...
INCIDENT DATE25/10/2025
STATUSInternal investigation initiated (status unclear)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Remarket Space's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Remarket Space Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Remarket Space breach identified under incident ID REM1764598512.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Remarket Space's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/remarketspace, the number of followers: 585, the industry type: Retail and the number of employees: 9 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 767 and after the incident was 675 with a difference of -92 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Remarket Space and their customers.

On 29 November 2025, Remarket Space disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Remarket Space Data Breach Affecting 7,146 Individuals".

Remarket Space, a used car auction and vehicle marketplace, experienced a data breach exposing driver’s license images (including names, dates of birth, addresses, and other PII) of at least 7,146 individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting AWS S3 file storage, and exposing Driver’s license images (names, dates of birth, addresses, PII), with nearly 7,146 records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured compromised systems, Reset system credentials and Enhanced access protections, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification to Maine Attorney General and Advisories to affected individuals (recommendations for identity theft protection, credit monitoring, fraud alerts).

The case underscores how Internal investigation initiated (status unclear), and recommending next steps like Sign up for free identity theft protection services (if offered by Remarket Space), Monitor credit reports and financial accounts for unusual activity and Be alert for phishing emails/phone calls exploiting exposed information, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to affected individuals with mitigation recommendations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating external Hacking (AWS S3 Storage Compromise) suggests abuse of cloud account access. and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aWS S3 file storage compromise implies potential exploitation of misconfigured/public-facing storage.. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating reset system credentials suggests credentials may have been exposed or stored insecurely.. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s license images (names, dates of birth, addresses, PII) explicitly collected from AWS S3. and Data from Cloud Storage (T1039) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating targeting its Amazon Web Services (AWS) S3 file storage for PII exfiltration.. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1048.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as true from AWS S3; high sensitivity (identity verification documents). and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating large-scale exposure (7,146 records) suggests automated collection/exfiltration.. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall (T1598.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating enhanced access protections post-breach implies prior defenses may have been impaired. and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no direct evidence, but secured compromised systems could imply remediation of tampered data/storage.. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating enhanced access protections post-incident suggests attackers may have disabled existing defenses.. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References