Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC » REG1766441262

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (REG1766441262)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-69
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident687 / 1000
Company LinkView REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERREG1766441262
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal identifiable information and...
INCIDENT DATE04/10/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC breach identified under incident ID REG1766441262.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/regional-urology-asc-llc, the number of followers: 453, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 69 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -69 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on REGIONAL UROLOGY, LLC and their customers.

On 09 December 2025, Regional Urology disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Regional Urology Data Breach".

Regional Urology experienced a data breach where sensitive personal identifiable information and protected health information may have been compromised.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Legacy systems retired since 2022, and exposing Sensitive personal identifiable information and protected health information.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Posted notice on website and filed official notice with HHS OCR.

The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like Providing affected individuals with complimentary credit monitoring services, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Posted notice on website with details of the breach and offered complimentary credit monitoring services.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unusual activity in legacy infrastructure that had been inactive since 2022 and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party accessed retired systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials In Files (T1552.005) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating legacy systems retired since 2022 may have contained stored credentials. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Confirmed, and potentially exfiltrated data on or around October 5, 2025 and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access and acquisition of sensitive data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating legacy systems inactive since 2022 may have been tampered with and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware or encryption in incident details. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unusual activity detected in retired systems and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating legacy systems may have had residual cloud access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Credentials In Files (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Automated Exfiltration (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (20%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (60%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (40%)

Sources & References