Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)
VS
Houston MethodistHouston Methodist
Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)

Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)

728 North Main Street, Spring Valley, 10977, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.refuahhealth.org
725/1000Moderate

Refuah Health Center is an innovation, population health driven FQHC serving close to 80,000 patients across New York's Lower Hudson Valley. Featuring three state-of-the-art facilities, twenty-nine departments, and more than two hundred dedicated medical and dental prof...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:215
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Houston Methodist

Houston Methodist

6565 Fannin St, Houston, 77030, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

Houston Methodist is one of the nation’s leading health systems and academic medical centers. The health system consists of eight hospitals: Houston Methodist Hospital, its flagship academic hospital in the Texas Medical Center, seven community hospitals and one long-te...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:21,373
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)

Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Houston Methodist

Houston Methodist

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Houston Methodist has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Houston Methodist (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Houston Methodist cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)

Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
REF232311822
Houston Methodist

Houston Methodist

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HOULEN1769632931
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
HOU115424722

FAQ

Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) company and Houston Methodist company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) and Houston Methodist, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) and Houston Methodist, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) or Houston Methodist ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) or Houston Methodist ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) and Houston Methodist, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Refuah Health Center (RefuahHealth) and Houston Methodist, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2