Comparison Overview
Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety

Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety
London, EC1Y 8ST, GB
Last Update: 17/06/2026
Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety assists public safety employers source the right talent for their organisations and assist all employers to source the specialist skills and experience associated with the public safety sector. Red Snapper Recruitment is part of...

Gi Group
Piazza IV Novembre, 5, Milan, MI, IT
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Welcome to Gi Group! Your job, Our work! Gi Group is one of the world’s leading companies providing a full range of HR Services. We offer Temporary, Permanent and Professional Staffing Services, Search & Selection and Executive Search as well as Outsourcing, Training,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety







Gi Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety in 2026.
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gi Group in 2026.
Incident History - Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gi Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gi Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Red Snapper Recruitment | Public Safety

Gi Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.