Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivAReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA
VS
TransUnionTransUnion
ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA

ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA

Via dei Missaglia, 97, None, Milano , Lombardia, IT, 20156

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Siamo più di 1000 professionisti, impegnati in progetti di trasformazione dei Financial Services. Integriamo competenze diversificate, per creare piattaforme ed ecosistemi di collaborazione digitali, aperti e dinamici, in sinergia con i laboratori del Gruppo AlmavivA. ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:343
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TransUnion

TransUnion

Chicago, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.transunion.com
169/1000Critical

TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing an actionable picture of each person so they can be reliably represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can trans...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:17,105
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
15
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA

ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TransUnion

TransUnion

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

TransUnion has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TransUnion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TransUnion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA

ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TransUnion

TransUnion

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRADOMOPT1787978104
🔒 Incident : Breach
700TRACORMUN1786373838
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA1766008553

FAQ

Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA company and TransUnion company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA and TransUnion, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA and TransUnion, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA or TransUnion ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA or TransUnion ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA and TransUnion, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ReActive | Gruppo AlmavivA and TransUnion, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3