Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hire React Native Developers » VULJFRREA1770209168

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (VULJFRREA1770209168)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident748 / 1000
Company Score After Incident746 / 1000
Company LinkView Hire React Native Developers Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERVULJFRREA1770209168
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORUnauthenticated POST request to /open-url endpoint
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE20/12/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hire React Native Developers's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hire React Native Developers Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hire React Native Developers breach identified under incident ID VULJFRREA1770209168.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hire React Native Developers's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/react-native-developers, the number of followers: 1236, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 3 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 746 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hire React Native Developers and their customers.

On 21 December 2025, React Native Developers disclosed Remote Code Execution (RCE) issues under the banner "Hackers Exploit Critical React Native Metro Vulnerability (CVE-2025-11953) for Cross-Platform Attacks".

Hackers are actively exploiting CVE-2025-11953, a critical vulnerability in the Metro server for React Native, to deliver malicious payloads targeting Windows and Linux systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows, Linux.

In response, and began remediation that includes Patch to @react-native-community/cli-server-api version 20.0.0.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Patch affected systems to @react-native-community/cli-server-api version 20.0.0 or later. Monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) provided by VulnCheck.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exploiting CVE-2025-11953 in Metro server for React Native, and unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via crafted POST request. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating base-64 encoded PowerShell payloads delivered via exploitation and Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating arbitrary OS commands executed via crafted POST request to /open-url endpoint. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating disable Microsoft Defender protections by adding exclusion paths and Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing (T1027.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rust-based UPX-packed binary with anti-analysis features. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating raw TCP connection to attacker-controlled infrastructure. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating raw TCP connection to attacker-controlled infrastructure implies data exfiltration. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (90%)
Exploitation for Client Execution (80%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (90%)
Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)

Sources & References