What is the official website of RATP Dev USA ?

The official website of RATP Dev USA is http://www.ratpdevusa.com.

What is RATP Dev USA's cybersecurity risk score?

RATP Dev USA has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 744 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has RATP Dev USA experienced?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has RATP Dev USA been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does RATP Dev USA have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does RATP Dev USA have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does RATP Dev USA comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does RATP Dev USA have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does RATP Dev USA comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, RATP Dev USA is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does RATP Dev USA have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,RATP Dev USA is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does RATP Dev USA operate in ?

RATP Dev USA operates primarily in the Urban Transit Services industry.

How many employees does RATP Dev USA have ?

RATP Dev USA employs approximately 212 people worldwide.

Does RATP Dev USA own any subsidiaries ?

RATP Dev USA presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does RATP Dev USA have ?

RATP Dev USA's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 8,801 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for RATP Dev USA ?

RATP Dev USA is classified under the NAICS code 4851, which corresponds to Urban Transit Systems.

Does RATP Dev USA have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, RATP Dev USA does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does RATP Dev USA have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, RATP Dev USA maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ratp-dev-north-america.

How many cybersecurity incidents has RATP Dev USA experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that RATP Dev USA has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does RATP Dev USA have ?

RATP Dev USA has an estimated 88 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has RATP Dev USA faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

RDU

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

744

/1000

Moderate

769

/1000

Fair

RATP Dev USA Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ratpdevusa.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

RATP Dev is a subsidiary of RATP Group established in 2002 to export the Group's operating and maintenance know how outside the historic transit network operated by RATP in the Paris region of France. RATP Dev now operates in 13 countries on four continents. In 2015, RATP Dev generated revenue exceeding 1.1B euros. In North America, RATP Dev USA employs over 6,000 team members transporting more than 80 million passengers throughout the U.S., and operates a wide range of services to include; fixed route, paratransit, rail, tour bus, and sightseeing shuttles.

RDU

RATP Dev USA CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

RATP Dev USA

Cyber Attack

100

7/2024

RAT000072624

Loading…

A.I.

RDU Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for RDU

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATP Dev USA in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATP Dev USA in 2026.

Incident Types RDU vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATP Dev USA in 2026.

Incident History - RDU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

RATP Dev USA Subsidiaries

RDU

Urban Transit Services

Website: http://www.ratpdevusa.com

Company Size: 212

RATP DevUrban Transit Services

RATP Dev Mobility CairoTruck Transportation

RATP Dev CasablancaTruck Transportation

RATP Dev Middle East & North AfricaTruck Transportation

RATP Dev Transit LondonTruck Transportation

autolinee toscaneTruck Transportation

TootbusLeisure, Travel & Tourism

Bombela Operating Company (PTY) LTD.Rail Transportation

EM Services (RATP Dev)Business Consulting and Services

RATP Dev France-SuisseUrban Transit Services

Hong Kong TramwaysRail Transportation

GEST SPATruck Transportation

Loading…

RATP Dev USA Similar Companies

RATPgroup

https://ratpgroup.com

The RATP Group is the world's third largest public transport company, carrying 12 million people every day in France and around the world. It boasts unrivalled experience in design, project management, operation and maintenance of all types of urban and suburban transport, making it an industry leader called upon around the globe for its expertise. The RATP Group already operates in 15 countries through 100 subsidiaries and is stepping up its international expansion through some major projects worldwide. The RATP Group is also a strong proponent of sustainable mobility. It has the know-how to meet new service quality challenges by anticipating new passenger expectations in terms of information, accessibility, safety, regularity and service innovation. The RATP Group at a glance: - 71,000 employees - Operations in 15 countries Specialisations: Operation, maintenance and engineering of passenger transport networks: urban and suburban transport (train, metro, tramway, bus)

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

mta.info

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is North America's largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people in the 5,000-square-mile area fanning out from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. The MTA comprises six agencies: MTA New York City Transit, MTA Bus Company, MTA Long Island Rail Road, MTA Metro-North Railroad, MTA Bridges and Tunnels, and MTA Construction & Development. The MTA network has the nation’s largest bus fleet and more subway and commuter rail cars than all other U.S. transit systems combined. It provides around 2.6 billion trips each year, accounting for about one-third of the nation’s mass transit users and two-thirds of its commuter rail passengers. MTA Bridges and Tunnels, which recorded a record 329 million crossings in 2019, carries more vehicles than any other bridge and tunnel authority in the nation. Interested in doing great work that impacts the lives of millions every day? Apply for a position today. You’ll not only have an opportunity to bring your skills to a mission in which you can take pride, you’ll enjoy first-class benefits including pension and 401(k) retirement savings plans, Wellness programs, Insurance plans, Healthcare plans, a generous vacation and leave package, and medical coverage for spouses, domestic partners, and dependents. The MTA’s provision of safe, clean, efficient public transportation is the lifeblood of the New York City area.

Loading…

NEWS

RATP Dev USA CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

June 11, 2024 07:00 AM

RATP Dev USA announces leadership changes to foster growth

RATP Dev USA announces leadership changes with Cyril Aubin promoted to Business Unit Director overseeing US and UK operations, and Matt Booterbaugh promoted to...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

RATP Dev USA Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

RDU A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

RATP Dev USA CyberSecurity News & History

RDU Company Scoring based on AI Models