Comparison Overview

RATP Dev USA

VS

RATPgroup

RATP Dev USA

300 Throckmorton St., Fort Worth, Texas, 76102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

RATP Dev is a subsidiary of RATP Group established in 2002 to export the Group's operating and maintenance know how outside the historic transit network operated by RATP in the Paris region of France. RATP Dev now operates in 13 countries on four continents. In 2015, RATP Dev generated revenue exceeding 1.1B euros. In North America, RATP Dev USA employs over 6,000 team members transporting more than 80 million passengers throughout the U.S., and operates a wide range of services to include; fixed route, paratransit, rail, tour bus, and sightseeing shuttles.

NAICS: 4851
NAICS Definition: Urban Transit Systems
Employees: 212
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

RATPgroup

54 Quai de la Rapée PARIS, 75012, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The RATP Group is the world's third largest public transport company, carrying 12 million people every day in France and around the world. It boasts unrivalled experience in design, project management, operation and maintenance of all types of urban and suburban transport, making it an industry leader called upon around the globe for its expertise. The RATP Group already operates in 15 countries through 100 subsidiaries and is stepping up its international expansion through some major projects worldwide. The RATP Group is also a strong proponent of sustainable mobility. It has the know-how to meet new service quality challenges by anticipating new passenger expectations in terms of information, accessibility, safety, regularity and service innovation. The RATP Group at a glance: - 71,000 employees - Operations in 15 countries Specialisations: Operation, maintenance and engineering of passenger transport networks: urban and suburban transport (train, metro, tramway, bus)

NAICS: 4851
NAICS Definition: Urban Transit Systems
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ratp-dev-north-america.jpeg
RATP Dev USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ratp.jpeg
RATPgroup
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RATP Dev USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RATPgroup
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATP Dev USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATPgroup in 2025.

Incident History — RATP Dev USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATP Dev USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RATPgroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATPgroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ratp-dev-north-america.jpeg
RATP Dev USA
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Enhancing security during the Paris Olympics
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ratp.jpeg
RATPgroup
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RATPgroup company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RATP Dev USA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

RATP Dev USA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RATPgroup company has not reported any.

In the current year, RATPgroup company and RATP Dev USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RATPgroup company nor RATP Dev USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RATPgroup company nor RATP Dev USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

RATP Dev USA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while RATPgroup company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RATP Dev USA company nor RATPgroup company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RATP Dev USA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RATPgroup company.

RATPgroup company employs more people globally than RATP Dev USA company, reflecting its scale as a Urban Transit Services.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RATP Dev USA nor RATPgroup holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X