Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rare Finds Hotels & ResortsRare Finds Hotels & Resorts
VS
Shangri-La GroupShangri-La Group
Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts

Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts

N/A

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

Rare Finds is a collection that brings to the forefront the essence of a place. Joining people together through authentic and soulful experiences, their proximity to rich cultures offer distinctly humbling journeys of incredible discovery.

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

Kerry Centre, 683 King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
726/1000Moderate

Headquartered in Hong Kong SAR, the Shangri-La Group has grown from a single hotel business to a diverse and integrated global portfolio comprising quality real estate and investment properties, wellness and lifestyle facilities. Today, the Group owns, operates and mana...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:16,362
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts

Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shangri-La Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shangri-La Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shangri-La Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts

Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA2110161122

FAQ

Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts and Shangri-La Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts and Shangri-La Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts or Shangri-La Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts or Shangri-La Group ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts and Shangri-La Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rare Finds Hotels & Resorts and Shangri-La Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1