Randstad-hong-kong vs Gi-group - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

Randstad Hong Kong

Gi Group

Randstad Hong Kong

33/F, Sino Plaza, Causeway Bay, HK

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://www.randstad.com.hk/

761/1000Fair

Randstad is a global talent leader with the vision to be the world’s most equitable and specialised talent company. As a partner for talent and through our four specialisations — Operational, Professional, Digital and Enterprise — we provide clients with the high-qualit...

NAICS:5613

NAICS Definition:Employment Services

Employees:442

Subsidiaries:27

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Gi Group

Piazza IV Novembre, 5, Milan, MI, IT

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.gigroup.com

810/1000Good

Welcome to Gi Group! Your job, Our work! Gi Group is one of the world’s leading companies providing a full range of HR Services. We offer Temporary, Permanent and Professional Staffing Services, Search & Selection and Executive Search as well as Outsourcing, Training,...

NAICS:5613

NAICS Definition:Employment Services

Employees:17,107

Subsidiaries:13

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Randstad Hong Kong

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Gi Group

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Randstad Hong Kong in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gi Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Randstad Hong Kong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Randstad Hong Kong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gi Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gi Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Randstad Hong Kong

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Gi Group

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong company and Gi Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong and Gi Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong and Gi Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Randstad Hong Kong or Gi Group ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Randstad Hong Kong or Gi Group ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong and Gi Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Randstad Hong Kong and Gi Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES