Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ram ProfessionalRam Professional
VS
TennecoTenneco
Ram Professional

Ram Professional

1000 Chrysler Dr, Auburn Hills, 48326, US

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile

Ram Professional’s dependable lineup of trucks and vans offers remarkable capabilities with advanced safety and security features, under one streamlined ecosystem. From our durable and reliable Ram Chassis Cab to our versatile and spacious Ram ProMaster® work vans, Ram...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tenneco

Tenneco

15701 Technology Dr., Northville, Michigan, US, 48168

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tenneco.com
784/1000Fair

We’re united by one purpose: to be the most trusted partner and the best manufacturer and distributor to the transportation industry. And we’re doing it by leaning into the one thing no one can copy: our culture — our sustainable competitive advantage. The Tenneco Way ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:21,016
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ram Professional

Ram Professional

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tenneco

Tenneco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ram Professional in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenneco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ram Professional (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ram Professional cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tenneco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenneco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ram Professional

Ram Professional

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tenneco

Tenneco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ram Professional company and Tenneco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ram Professional and Tenneco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ram Professional and Tenneco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ram Professional or Tenneco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ram Professional or Tenneco ?
Between Ram Professional and Tenneco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ram Professional and Tenneco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA