Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RAI1765556736)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Rainbird Technologies's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Rainbird Technologies Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rainbird Technologies breach identified under incident ID RAI1765556736.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rainbird Technologies's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rainbird-technologies-ltd, the number of followers: 5110, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 48 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 664 with a difference of -87 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rainbird Technologies and their customers.
On 10 December 2025, Rain Bird Corporation disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Rain Bird Corporation Data Breach".
Rain Bird Corporation, a leading global manufacturer of irrigation products and services, experienced a data breach impacting its online web store.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Rain Bird web store, and exposing Payment card information, with nearly 24,862 records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured environment, and began remediation that includes Comprehensive investigation, notification to regulators and affected individuals, while recovery efforts such as Offering credit monitoring and identity restoration services continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification to Attorney Generals' offices and affected individuals by mail.
The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like Sign up for free Cyberscout identity theft protection services, Monitor credit reports and financial accounts for unusual activity and Be alert for phishing emails or phone calls, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Call center set up at 833-971-2302, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including unauthorized access to web store systems, and suspicious activity within its web store systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accessed payment card information used in transactions and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed payment card details... names, credit card numbers, CVV codes. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actors had accessed payment card information. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of encryption, but high-impact data exposure and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating payment card information used in transactions (potential misuse). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Rainbird Technologies Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/rainbird-technologies-ltd/incident/RAI1765556736
- Rainbird Technologies CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/rainbird-technologies-ltd
- Rainbird Technologies Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/rai1765556736-rainbird-technologies-breach-december-2025/
- Rainbird Technologies CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/rainbird-technologies-ltd/history
- Rainbird Technologies CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/rain-bird-2025
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf