Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Questel » QUE1788240299

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (QUE1788240299)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-87
Company Score Before Incident758 / 1000
Company Score After Incident671 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERQUE1788240299
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED1.2 million records
INCIDENT DATE31/07/2026
STATUSUnder assessment

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Questel's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Questel Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Questel breach identified under incident ID QUE1788240299.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Questel's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/questel, the number of followers: 29025, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 1543 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 758 and after the incident was 671 with a difference of -87 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Questel and their customers.

Questel recently reported "Questel Hit by ShinyHunters Extortion Campaign, Exposing 1.2M Records", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In a recent cyberattack, intellectual property management firm Questel was targeted by the ShinyHunters hacking group as part of an extortion campaign.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 1.2 million records, with nearly 1.2 million records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under assessment.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating intellectual property management firm Questel was targeted and Phishing (T1566) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating heightened risks of targeted social engineering campaigns. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters hacking group...leaked data allegedly belonging to the company and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 51% of the exposed records were already publicly available on LinkedIn. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposing 1.2 million records containing sensitive personal information and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating emails, full names, employers, job titles, physical addresses, phone numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and 1.2 million records exposed and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters...leaked data allegedly belonging to the company. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating extortion campaign and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating risks of targeted social engineering campaigns leveraging the leaked information. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Phishing (40%)
Credential Access
Compromise Accounts (60%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References