Comparison Overview
Quality Hotel™

Quality Hotel™
undefined, Oslo, undefined, undefined, NO
Last Update: 28/10/2025
Quality Hotel™ specializes in meaningful meetings. Meetings between colleagues during weekdays and meetings between family members who want to spend quality time together when work is over. Quality Hotel™ is one of the largest hotel chains in the Nordics with 60+ confer...

Hampton
7930 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 1100, McLean, 22102, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The Hampton brand, including Hampton Inn, Hampton Inn & Suites and Hampton by Hilton, is an award-winning leader in the upper-midscale hotel segment. With more than 2,700 properties in 32 countries globally, Hampton is part of Hilton Worldwide, the leading global hospit...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Quality Hotel™







Hampton






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Quality Hotel™ in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hampton in 2026.
Incident History - Quality Hotel™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quality Hotel™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Hampton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hampton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Quality Hotel™

Hampton
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.