ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

The Hampton brand, including Hampton Inn, Hampton Inn & Suites and Hampton by Hilton, is an award-winning leader in the upper-midscale hotel segment. With more than 2,700 properties in 32 countries globally, Hampton is part of Hilton Worldwide, the leading global hospitality company. All Hampton Hotels offer warm surroundings and a friendly service culture and personality, defined as “Hamptonality,” supported by its 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. High-quality accommodations, in-room conveniences and the latest technology, combined with numerous locations and consistent offerings, have made Hampton a leader in its segment and one of the fastest growing hotel brands. For more information please visit: www.hampton.com www.hamptonfranchise.com news.hampton.com www.hiltonworldwide.com/careers/ To connect with us on social please visit: www.facebook.com/hampton www.twitter.com/hampton www.youtube.com/hampton

Hampton A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Hampton

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

hampton

Employees number:

11,130

Number of followers:

47,584

NAICS:

7211

Industry Type:

Hospitality

Homepage:

hilton.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

HAM_2425343

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreHampton Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hampton.jpeg
Hampton Hospitality
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreHampton Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hampton.jpeg
Hampton Hospitality
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Hampton Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
4
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
HiltonBreach50211/2015
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Hilton Worldwide Holdings, a hotel group, revealed that credit card information was stolen by cybercriminals from a few of its point-of-sale systems. Executive vice president of Hilton Global Brands Jim Holthouser claims that malware compromised PoS systems, enabling hackers to obtain client information such as credit card numbers, expiration dates, security codes, and names of credit card holders. In certain point-of-sale systems, unauthorised malware that targeted credit card information has been found and removed by Hilton Worldwide. It was discovered that the data breach did not expose the customer's addresses or personal identification numbers.

Hilton Worldwide, Inc.Breach85411/2014
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In November 2015, the California Office of the Attorney General disclosed that Hilton Worldwide suffered a **malware-driven data breach** targeting its **point-of-sale (POS) systems**. The attack compromised **payment card data** of customers who made transactions at Hilton hotels during two distinct periods: **November 18–December 5, 2014**, and **April 21–July 27, 2015**. The exposed information included **cardholder names, payment card numbers, security codes, and expiration dates**, though **addresses and PINs remained unaffected**. The breach stemmed from unauthorized malware infiltrating Hilton’s POS environment, enabling attackers to harvest sensitive financial details during transactions. While the exact number of affected customers was not specified, the prolonged exposure window heightened risks of **fraudulent card activity, identity theft, and financial losses** for victims. Hilton took remedial actions, including **enhancing payment security protocols** and collaborating with law enforcement. However, the incident underscored vulnerabilities in hospitality sector cybersecurity, particularly in safeguarding **customer financial data** against evolving malware threats. The breach did not involve ransomware or broader systemic disruptions but focused solely on **payment card exploitation** during the specified timeframes.

Hilton Hotels & ResortsBreach100511/2017
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The Hilton hotel chain was accused of improperly handling two distinct cyberattacks that resulted in the exposure of its customers' financial information, and as a result, it agreed to pay Vermont and New York $700,000. According to the inquiry, thieves put denial-of-service malware on Hilton's payment systems, which would have exposed cardholders' personal information. The business is held accountable for the customers' delayed notice and is charged with having a payment method with inadequate security. Hilton will improve the security of its payment systems and internal incident response protocols as part of the settlement.

Hilton Hotels & ResortsBreach100609/2015
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: The credit card details of numerous customers were leaked after common point-of-sale registers in gift shops and restaurants at a large number of Hilton Hotel was compromised. Hilton hotel apologized to all the customers and investigated the incident with the data security team. The hotel was also fined $700K for the breach.

Hilton
Breach
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 11/2015
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Hilton Worldwide Holdings, a hotel group, revealed that credit card information was stolen by cybercriminals from a few of its point-of-sale systems. Executive vice president of Hilton Global Brands Jim Holthouser claims that malware compromised PoS systems, enabling hackers to obtain client information such as credit card numbers, expiration dates, security codes, and names of credit card holders. In certain point-of-sale systems, unauthorised malware that targeted credit card information has been found and removed by Hilton Worldwide. It was discovered that the data breach did not expose the customer's addresses or personal identification numbers.

Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 11/2014
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In November 2015, the California Office of the Attorney General disclosed that Hilton Worldwide suffered a **malware-driven data breach** targeting its **point-of-sale (POS) systems**. The attack compromised **payment card data** of customers who made transactions at Hilton hotels during two distinct periods: **November 18–December 5, 2014**, and **April 21–July 27, 2015**. The exposed information included **cardholder names, payment card numbers, security codes, and expiration dates**, though **addresses and PINs remained unaffected**. The breach stemmed from unauthorized malware infiltrating Hilton’s POS environment, enabling attackers to harvest sensitive financial details during transactions. While the exact number of affected customers was not specified, the prolonged exposure window heightened risks of **fraudulent card activity, identity theft, and financial losses** for victims. Hilton took remedial actions, including **enhancing payment security protocols** and collaborating with law enforcement. However, the incident underscored vulnerabilities in hospitality sector cybersecurity, particularly in safeguarding **customer financial data** against evolving malware threats. The breach did not involve ransomware or broader systemic disruptions but focused solely on **payment card exploitation** during the specified timeframes.

Hilton Hotels & Resorts
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2017
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The Hilton hotel chain was accused of improperly handling two distinct cyberattacks that resulted in the exposure of its customers' financial information, and as a result, it agreed to pay Vermont and New York $700,000. According to the inquiry, thieves put denial-of-service malware on Hilton's payment systems, which would have exposed cardholders' personal information. The business is held accountable for the customers' delayed notice and is charged with having a payment method with inadequate security. Hilton will improve the security of its payment systems and internal incident response protocols as part of the settlement.

Hilton Hotels & Resorts
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 09/2015
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: The credit card details of numerous customers were leaked after common point-of-sale registers in gift shops and restaurants at a large number of Hilton Hotel was compromised. Hilton hotel apologized to all the customers and investigated the incident with the data security team. The hotel was also fined $700K for the breach.

Ailogo

Hampton Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Hampton

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hampton in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hampton in 2025.

Incident Types Hampton vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hampton in 2025.

Incident History — Hampton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hampton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Hampton Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The Hampton brand, including Hampton Inn, Hampton Inn & Suites and Hampton by Hilton, is an award-winning leader in the upper-midscale hotel segment. With more than 2,700 properties in 32 countries globally, Hampton is part of Hilton Worldwide, the leading global hospitality company. All Hampton Hotels offer warm surroundings and a friendly service culture and personality, defined as “Hamptonality,” supported by its 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. High-quality accommodations, in-room conveniences and the latest technology, combined with numerous locations and consistent offerings, have made Hampton a leader in its segment and one of the fastest growing hotel brands. For more information please visit: www.hampton.com www.hamptonfranchise.com news.hampton.com www.hiltonworldwide.com/careers/ To connect with us on social please visit: www.facebook.com/hampton www.twitter.com/hampton www.youtube.com/hampton

Loading...
similarCompanies

Hampton Similar Companies

Stonegate Group

We’re the UK's biggest pub company, but that’s not all we are. We’re an incredible team bringing people together through our 4,500+ sites nationwide. Formed in 2010 with 333 pubs, Stonegate Group has grown bigger and better than ever, and today we’re home to well-loved sites such as Slug &

Accor

We are Accor We are more than 290,000 hospitality experts placing people at the heart of what we do, creating emotion for our guests, and nurturing passion for service and achievement beyond limits. Building on the strength of our teams and of our fully integrated ecosystem of leading brands, perso

Hilton

Hilton (NYSE: HLT) is a leading global hospitality company with a portfolio of 24 world-class brands comprising more than 8,400 properties and over 1.25 million rooms, in 140 countries and territories. Dedicated to fulfilling its founding vision to fill the earth with the light and warmth of hospita

Taj Hotels

Established in 1903, Taj is The Indian Hotels Company Limited’s (IHCL) iconic brand for the world’s most discerning travellers seeking luxury and authentic experiences. Taj has been rated as India’s Strongest Brand across all sectors for an unprecedented fourth time and also as the World’s Strongest

SJM Resorts

SJM Resorts, S.A. ("SJM") is one of the six concessionaires in Macau, authorised by the Government of the Macau Special Administrative Region to operate casinos and gaming areas. SJM is also the only casino gaming concessionaire with its roots in Macau. SJM owns and operates the Grand Lisboa Palace

ITC Hotels Limited

Established in 1975, ITC Hotels Limited has grown to encompass over 140+ hotels across 90+ destinations, solidifying its presence in the Indian subcontinent ITC Hotels seamlessly blends India’s rich tradition of hospitality with globally benchmarked services, offering a collection of hotels and res

J D Wetherspoon

J D Wetherspoon is a leading pub operator in the UK and Ireland. Back in 1979, founder chairman Tim Martin opened the very first Wetherspoon – in Muswell Hill, north London. Today, Tim and the company run over 850 pubs and hotels, spread right across the UK and, more recently, Ireland. During its hi

The Country Club India Ltd

CCIL - Country Club India Ltd is one of the fastest growing entertainment and leisure conglomerate in India. A Multi-Million dollar entity and a listed company on BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange), CCIL is a pioneer in the concept of family clubbing in the country. CCIL has established 205 properties of w

Kerzner International

Kerzner International has built a diverse collection of iconic brands and luxury properties, earning international acclaim for pioneering destination-defining hospitality, delivering unrivalled service, and curating transformative guest experiences. We are renowned for creating hospitality brands

newsone

Hampton CyberSecurity News

December 04, 2025 07:59 PM
Experian details AI's increasing role in cybersecurity on Coast Live

HAMPTON ROADS, Va. — Michael Bruemmer, Vice President of Experian Global Data Breach Resolution and Consumer Protection at Experian,...

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM
Eastern Connecticut State University Officially Starts New Cybersecurity Minor

WILLIMANTIC, CT — Eastern Connecticut State University launched a new cybersecurity minor in the fall 2025 semester.

October 29, 2025 07:15 PM
The following is the announcement made by the East Hampton, New York, library:

Joseph Steinberg, author of "CyberSecurity for Dummies,” and a Columbia University lecturer on the subject, will be speaking for the East Hampton New York...

October 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Incident Response Defenses: Can You Take Advantage of a Cyber Program Safe Harbor?

We are in the final quarter of the year, which is typically budgeting and planning for many issues, including -hopefully!

October 14, 2025 03:23 PM
Joseph Steinberg To Moderate AI and Cybersecurity Panel for Columbia Business School Alumni

Next month, cybersecurity expert Joseph Steinberg will moderate panel on Artificial Intelligence for the Columbia Business School Alumni Association.

September 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Portsmouth Public Library: AI And Cybersecurity Talk Oct. 1

See the latest announcement from the Portsmouth Public Library.

September 16, 2025 07:00 AM
Don’t Fall Behind: The CMMC Final Rule to Update the DFARS is Here!

On September 10, 2025, the final rule to implement the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (“CMMC”) program in the Defense Federal...

September 12, 2025 07:00 AM
Hampton Regional Medical Center Data Breach Exposes SSNs

Data breach at HRMC may have exposed names, SSNs, medical info, and more. Full impact still under review.

September 11, 2025 07:00 AM
New computer science and cybersecurity lab school gets middle schoolers involved at Oscar Smith Middle School

CHESAPEAKE, Va. (WAVY) – Old Dominion University and school divisions across the area are opening doors for students in STEM fields through...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Hampton CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Hampton

The official website of Hampton is http://www.hampton.com.

Hampton’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Hampton’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 790, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does Hampton’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Hampton currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Hampton have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Hampton is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Hampton have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Hampton does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Hampton comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Hampton is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Hampton have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Hampton does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Hampton comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Hampton is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Hampton have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Hampton is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Hampton

Hampton operates primarily in the Hospitality industry.

Number of Employees at Hampton

Hampton employs approximately 11,130 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Hampton

Hampton presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Hampton’s LinkedIn Followers

Hampton’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 47,584 followers.

NAICS Classification of Hampton

Hampton is classified under the NAICS code 7211, which corresponds to Traveler Accommodation.

Hampton’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Hampton does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Hampton’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Hampton maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hampton.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Hampton

As of December 11, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Hampton has experienced 4 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Hampton has an estimated 13,820 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Hampton ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Hampton ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $700 thousand.

How does Hampton detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with apologized to customers, and containment measures with malware removed from point-of-sale systems, and remediation measures with improve the security of payment systems, remediation measures with enhance internal incident response protocols..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Hilton Hotel Credit Card Data Breach

Description: The credit card details of numerous customers were leaked after common point-of-sale registers in gift shops and restaurants at a large number of Hilton Hotels were compromised.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale System

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Hilton Worldwide Credit Card Data Breach

Description: Credit card information was stolen by cybercriminals from a few of Hilton Worldwide Holdings' point-of-sale systems due to malware.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Malware

Vulnerability Exploited: Point-of-Sale Systems

Threat Actor: Cybercriminals

Motivation: Financial Gain

Incident : data breach

Title: Hilton Hotel Chain Data Breach and Malware Attack

Description: The Hilton hotel chain was accused of improperly handling two distinct cyberattacks that resulted in the exposure of its customers' financial information, and as a result, it agreed to pay Vermont and New York $700,000.

Type: data breach

Attack Vector: denial-of-service malware

Vulnerability Exploited: inadequate security of payment systems

Threat Actor: thieves

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Hilton Worldwide Payment Card Data Breach (2014-2015)

Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported that Hilton Worldwide experienced a data breach due to unauthorized malware targeting payment card information in point-of-sale systems. The breach affected customers who used payment cards at Hilton hotels between November 18, 2014, and December 5, 2014, and between April 21, 2015, and July 27, 2015. The compromised information included cardholder names, payment card numbers, security codes, and expiration dates, but not addresses or PINs.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2015-11-24

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Malware (Point-of-Sale Systems)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Point-of-Sale Registers and Point-of-Sale Systems.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Data Compromised: Credit Card Details

Systems Affected: Point-of-Sale Registers

Legal Liabilities: Fined $700K

Payment Information Risk: High

Incident : Data Breach HIL1733261023

Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Expiration dates, Security codes, Names of credit card holders

Systems Affected: Point-of-Sale Systems

Payment Information Risk: True

Incident : data breach HIL2335171223

Financial Loss: $700,000 in fines

Data Compromised: Customers' financial information

Systems Affected: payment systems

Legal Liabilities: charged with delayed notice and inadequate security

Payment Information Risk: high

Incident : Data Breach HIL038090625

Data Compromised: Cardholder names, Payment card numbers, Security codes, Expiration dates

Systems Affected: Point-of-Sale (PoS) systems

Identity Theft Risk: High (payment card details exposed)

Payment Information Risk: High (card numbers, security codes, expiration dates compromised)

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $175.00 thousand.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Credit Card Details, Credit Card Numbers, Expiration Dates, Security Codes, Names Of Credit Card Holders, , financial information, Payment Card Data, Personally Identifiable Information (Pii) and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Entity Name: Hilton Hotels

Entity Type: Hospitality

Industry: Hotel

Incident : Data Breach HIL1733261023

Entity Name: Hilton Worldwide Holdings

Entity Type: Hotel Group

Industry: Hospitality

Incident : data breach HIL2335171223

Entity Name: Hilton

Entity Type: corporation

Industry: hospitality

Incident : Data Breach HIL038090625

Entity Name: Hilton Worldwide

Entity Type: Hospitality

Industry: Hotel and Resort

Location: Global (primarily U.S. properties)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Communication Strategy: Apologized to customers

Incident : Data Breach HIL1733261023

Containment Measures: Malware removed from point-of-sale systems

Incident : data breach HIL2335171223

Remediation Measures: improve the security of payment systemsenhance internal incident response protocols

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Type of Data Compromised: Credit Card Details

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Breach HIL1733261023

Type of Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Expiration dates, Security codes, Names of credit card holders

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : data breach HIL2335171223

Type of Data Compromised: financial information

Sensitivity of Data: high

Incident : Data Breach HIL038090625

Type of Data Compromised: Payment card data, Personally identifiable information (pii)

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Yes (malware exfiltrated card data)

Personally Identifiable Information: Cardholder names

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: improve the security of payment systems, enhance internal incident response protocols, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by malware removed from point-of-sale systems.

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Fines Imposed: $700K

Incident : data breach HIL2335171223

Fines Imposed: $700,000

Incident : Data Breach HIL038090625

Regulatory Notifications: California Office of the Attorney General

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL038090625

Source: California Office of the Attorney General

Date Accessed: 2015-11-24

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2015-11-24.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Investigation Status: Investigated by data security team

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Apologized to customers.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL15823422

Entry Point: Point-of-Sale Registers

Incident : Data Breach HIL1733261023

Entry Point: Point-of-Sale Systems

Incident : Data Breach HIL038090625

High Value Targets: Payment Card Data,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Payment Card Data,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIL1733261023

Root Causes: Malware compromised PoS systems

Corrective Actions: Malware removed from point-of-sale systems

Incident : data breach HIL2335171223

Root Causes: Inadequate Security Of Payment Systems, Delayed Notice To Customers,

Corrective Actions: Improve The Security Of Payment Systems, Enhance Internal Incident Response Protocols,

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Malware removed from point-of-sale systems, Improve The Security Of Payment Systems, Enhance Internal Incident Response Protocols, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Cybercriminals and thieves.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2015-11-24.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $700,000 in fines.

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Credit Card Details, Credit card numbers, Expiration dates, Security codes, Names of credit card holders, , customers' financial information, , Cardholder names, Payment card numbers, Security codes, Expiration dates and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Point-of-Sale (PoS) systems.

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Malware removed from point-of-sale systems.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names of credit card holders, Cardholder names, Security codes, customers' financial information, Credit Card Details, Expiration dates, Payment card numbers and Credit card numbers.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was $700K, $700,000.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is California Office of the Attorney General.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Investigated by data security team.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Point-of-Sale Registers and Point-of-Sale Systems.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Malware compromised PoS systems, inadequate security of payment systemsdelayed notice to customers.

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Malware removed from point-of-sale systems, improve the security of payment systemsenhance internal incident response protocols.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=hampton' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge