Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Pyramid Global Hospitality » PYR1772121574

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PYR1772121574)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-86
Company Score Before Incident785 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPYR1772121574
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal information, including names,...
INCIDENT DATE13/08/2025
STATUSUnder review

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Pyramid Global Hospitality's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Pyramid Global Hospitality Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Pyramid Global Hospitality breach identified under incident ID PYR1772121574.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Pyramid Global Hospitality's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pyramid-global-hospitality, the number of followers: 67971, the industry type: Hospitality and the number of employees: 3265 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 785 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -86 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Pyramid Global Hospitality and their customers.

On 23 September 2025, Pyramid Global Hospitality disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Pyramid Global Hospitality Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information".

Pyramid Global Hospitality, a major third-party hospitality management firm, confirmed a data breach after the hacking group Worldleaks claimed responsibility and posted stolen data on the dark web.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal information, including names, Social Security numbers, driver’s license or state ID numbers, government identification numbers, financial account information, health insurance, and medical details, with nearly At least 1,299 (Maine residents only, total undisclosed) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications sent to affected individuals on October 29, 2025, and February 25, 2026.

The case underscores how Under review, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notifications sent to affected individuals on October 29, 2025, and February 25, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating confirmed a data breach after the hacking group Worldleaks claimed responsibility and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating major third-party hospitality management firm with 18,000 employees. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, driver’s license, financial account information exposed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating government identification numbers and health insurance details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, driver’s licenses, financial and medical details compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party hospitality management firm with sensitive customer data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating worldleaks posted stolen data on the dark web on September 23, 2025 and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting at least 1,299 Maine residents (total undisclosed). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence (severity such as 100) and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft and payment information risk noted. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (50%)

Sources & References