Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PwC PortugalPwC Portugal
VS
ConduentConduent
PwC Portugal

PwC Portugal

Avenida Fontes Pereira de Melo nº16 Lisboa, Lisboa 1050-121, PT

Last Update: 10/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pwc.pt
770/1000Fair

PwC firms collaborate with organisations and people to create the value they seek. Our network, made up of independent firms, is present in 149 countries and includes over 370,000 employees, who share the purpose of providing services in auditing, consulting, tax and le...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Conduent

Conduent

100 Campus Dr, Florham Park, New Jersey, US, 07932

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.conduent.com
100/1000Critical

Conduent delivers digital business solutions and services spanning the commercial, government and transportation spectrum – creating valuable outcomes for its clients and the millions of people who count on them. We leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, mac...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:37,668
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PwC Portugal

PwC Portugal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Conduent

Conduent

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC Portugal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Conduent has 466.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - PwC Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Conduent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PwC Portugal

PwC Portugal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Conduent

Conduent

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CON1776790111
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON1772670434
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
APP1770616335

FAQ

Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PwC Portugal company and Conduent company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PwC Portugal and Conduent, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PwC Portugal and Conduent, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PwC Portugal or Conduent ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PwC Portugal or Conduent ?
Between PwC Portugal and Conduent, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PwC Portugal and Conduent, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA