What is the official website of Pulse Secure ?

The official website of Pulse Secure is http://pulsesecure.net/.

What is Pulse Secure's cybersecurity risk score?

Pulse Secure has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 643 out of 1000, indicating a Poor security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Pulse Secure experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Pulse Secure been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure has been affected by multiple supply chain cyber incidents. The affected supply chain sources and their corresponding incident IDs are: Ivanti (Incident ID: PULIVA1778545811) PaperCut Software (Incident ID: VMWMICPAPIVA1775500095) Conduent (Incident ID: APP1770616335) Ivanti (Incident ID: SUB1770295740) Ivanti (Incident ID: EUR1770630855) Wonderful Copenhagen (Incident ID: IVA1769791658) Ivanti (Incident ID: IVAAUT1770515557) Ivanti (Incident ID: IVA1770746108) Ivanti (Incident ID: IVA357052325) Ivanti (Incident ID: CONMICPAPIVA1775607925)

Does Pulse Secure have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Pulse Secure have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Pulse Secure comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Pulse Secure have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Pulse Secure comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Pulse Secure is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Pulse Secure have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Pulse Secure is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Pulse Secure operate in ?

Pulse Secure operates primarily in the Computer Networking Products industry.

How many employees does Pulse Secure have ?

Pulse Secure employs approximately 121 people worldwide.

Does Pulse Secure own any subsidiaries ?

Pulse Secure presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Pulse Secure have ?

Pulse Secure's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 19,199 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Pulse Secure ?

Pulse Secure is classified under the NAICS code 51125, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Does Pulse Secure have a Crunchbase profile ?

Yes, Pulse Secure has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/pulse-secure.

Does Pulse Secure have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Pulse Secure maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pulse-secure.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Pulse Secure experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Pulse Secure has experienced 23 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Pulse Secure have ?

Pulse Secure has an estimated 1,048 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Pulse Secure

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

643

/1000

Poor

668

/1000

Weak

Pulse Secure Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

pulsesecure.net

cb in

Add Your Compliance Badge

Pulse Secure provides easy, comprehensive software-driven Secure Access solutions that provide visibility and seamless, protected connectivity between users, devices, things, and services. Our suites uniquely integrate cloud, mobile, application, and network access to enable hybrid IT in a Zero Trust world. Today, more than 80% of the Fortune 500 and over 20,000 enterprises (and 18M end-points) and service providers across every vertical entrust Pulse Secure to empower their mobile workforce to securely access applications and information in the data center and cloud while ensuring business compliance.

Pulse Secure A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Pulse Secure

Pulse Secure CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Ivanti

Cyber Attack

100

6/2026

FORCISTELLEXSAL...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

100

6/2026

IVA1781166735

Ivanti

Vulnerability

6/2026

IVA1780490432

Ivanti

Vulnerability

100

5/2026

Ivanti

PULIVA177854581...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

100

4/2026

PaperCut Softwa...

VMWMICPAPIVA177...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

3/2026

IVA1773167087

Ivanti

Ransomware

100

2/2026

IVAGARCRO177126...

Ivanti

Cyber Attack

2/2026

Conduent

APP1770616335

Ivanti

Breach

2/2026

Ivanti

SUB1770295740

Ivanti

Cyber Attack

1/2026

Ivanti

EUR1770630855

Ivanti

Vulnerability

1/2026

Wonderful Copen...

IVA1769791658

Pulse Secure

Cyber Attack

1/2026

PULSOPFORIVA177...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

1/2026

Ivanti

IVAAUT177051555...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

12/2025

IVASONCIS177670...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

10/2025

Ivanti

IVA1770746108

Pulse Secure

Vulnerability

100

6/2025

IVA631082925

Ivanti

Vulnerability

100

5/2025

Ivanti

IVA357052325

Ivanti

Cyber Attack

5/2025

PALIVASOPPULFOR...

Pulse Secure

Ransomware

100

4/2025

PUL707041025

Pulse Secure

Vulnerability

100

4/2025

IVA1001040225

Pulse Secure

Ransomware

100

3/2025

IVA327032225

Ivanti

Vulnerability

100

1/2025

UNIZIMFORIVA177...

Ivanti

Vulnerability

100

1/2025

Ivanti

CONMICPAPIVA177...

Loading…

A.I.

Pulse Secure Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Pulse Secure

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Avg (This Year)

Pulse Secure has 47.92% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Pulse Secure has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types Pulse Secure vs Computer Networking Products Industry Avg (This Year)

Pulse Secure reported 1 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History - Pulse Secure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Pulse Secure Subsidiaries

Pulse Secure

Computer Networking Products

Website: http://pulsesecure.net/

Company Size: 501-1,000 employees

IvantiSoftware Development

IT Leadership SummitSoftware Development

Ivanti WavelinkSoftware Development

Loading…

Pulse Secure Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Pulse Secure CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 28, 2026 08:00 AM

Israel Launches Historic Cyberattacks Against The Islamic Republic of Iran

Read Article

February 24, 2026 08:00 AM

Ivanti VPN Flaws Exploited by Chinese Hackers Impacting Almost 120 Organizations, Report Says

Historic Breach: Reports indicate Chinese state-sponsored actors exploited Ivanti's Pulse Secure VPN to infiltrate U.S. networks.

Read Article

February 23, 2026 08:00 AM

VPN flaws allowed Chinese hackers to compromise dozens of Ivanti customers, says report

In February 2021, software giant Ivanti discovered that Chinese hackers had breached the network of Pulse Secure, one of its subsidiaries...

Read Article

February 22, 2026 08:00 AM

Anthropic's New Claude AI Security Tool Wipes Out Over $15 Billion From Cybersecurity Stocks

Read Article

February 20, 2026 08:00 AM

How Private Equity Debt Left a Leading VPN Open to Chinese Hackers

In early 2024, the agency that oversees cybersecurity for much of the US government issued a rare emergency order — disconnect your Connect...

Read Article

February 20, 2026 08:00 AM

Chinese Hackers Bypassed a U.S. Government VPN, Raising New Cybersecurity Concerns

Chinese hackers compromised CISA's own systems through Ivanti VPN software, forcing federal agencies to disconnect after private equity cuts...

Read Article

February 15, 2026 08:00 AM

As AI agents take over, security is becoming a bigger concern

A new report from Microsoft says AI agents could pose a cybersecurity threat to some businesses.

Read Article

February 10, 2026 08:00 AM

Cyber Pulse: An AI Security Report

With the rise in AI agent adoption, now is the time to implement observability, governance, and security. Read the Cyber Pulse report for...

Read Article

February 10, 2026 08:00 AM

80% of Fortune 500 use active AI Agents: Observability, governance, and security shape the new frontier

New Microsoft Cyber Pulse report outlines why organizations should observe, govern, and secure their AI transformation to move forward.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…