What is the official website of Public Art Fund ?

The official website of Public Art Fund is http://www.publicartfund.org.

What is Public Art Fund's cybersecurity risk score?

Public Art Fund has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 758 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Public Art Fund experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Public Art Fund been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Public Art Fund have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Public Art Fund have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Public Art Fund comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Public Art Fund have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Public Art Fund comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Public Art Fund is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Public Art Fund have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Public Art Fund is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Public Art Fund operate in ?

Public Art Fund operates primarily in the Artists and Writers industry.

How many employees does Public Art Fund have ?

Public Art Fund employs approximately 37 people worldwide.

Does Public Art Fund own any subsidiaries ?

Public Art Fund presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Public Art Fund have ?

Public Art Fund's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 20,553 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Public Art Fund ?

Public Art Fund is classified under the NAICS code 7115, which corresponds to Independent Artists, Writers, and Performers.

Does Public Art Fund have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Public Art Fund does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Public Art Fund have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Public Art Fund maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/public-art-fund.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Public Art Fund experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Public Art Fund has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Public Art Fund have ?

Public Art Fund has an estimated 1,194 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

PAF

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

758

/1000

Fair

783

/1000

Fair

Public Art Fund Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

publicartfund.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

As the leader in its field, Public Art Fund brings dynamic contemporary art to a broad audience in New York City and beyond by mounting ambitious free exhibitions of international scope and impact that offer the public powerful experiences with art and the urban environment. Public Art Fund was founded in 1977 by Doris C. Freedman (1928-1981), a champion of public art who served as New York City's first Director of Cultural Affairs, President of the Municipal Art Society of New York, and was a tireless supporter of New York City's Percent for Art legislation. In 1971, she founded the Public Arts Council while at the same time serving as president of City Walls Inc. Under her leadership, both organizations developed programs to explore

PAF A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

PAF

Public Art Fund CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

PAF Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PAF

Incidents vs Artists and Writers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Art Fund in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Art Fund in 2026.

Incident Types PAF vs Artists and Writers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Art Fund in 2026.

Incident History - PAF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Public Art Fund Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PAF

Artists and Writers

Website: http://www.publicartfund.org

Company Size: 37

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Public Art Fund Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Public Art Fund CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 25, 2026 08:00 AM

Victorian Women's Public Art Program

The Victorian Women's Public Art Program aims to address the underrepresentation of women and their achievements through enduring public artworks.

Read Article

February 03, 2026 08:00 AM

Art and Culture Censorship Timeline

Art and culture are popular targets of censorship. Check out this timeline and see how art and cultural censorship have evolved over time.

Read Article

December 03, 2025 05:58 PM

With ‘Letters Rewoven’ Project, Alum Anna Fubini (MET’23) Turns Arts Admin Coursework into Living Public Installation

Arts Administration alum Anna Fubini is the artist behind Letters Rewoven, a temporary public installation funded by the Somerville Arts Council that grew...

Read Article

October 09, 2025 07:00 AM

There is a new card for the Cleveland Public Library

The Cleveland Public Library has a new card for patrons without a permanent address that allows them to check out materials.

Read Article

August 06, 2025 07:00 AM

Initial Public Art Commissions Announced For Pittsburgh’s New Arts Landing

Pittsburgh Cultural Trust announced the first wave of public art projects which will be debuting at Arts Landing along with the park itself...

Read Article

June 23, 2025 07:00 AM

The Year of Quantum: From concept to reality in 2025

Explore the latest advancements in quantum computing, sensing, and communication with our comprehensive Quantum Technology Monitor 2025.

Read Article

June 17, 2025 07:00 AM

Public Art Investment Among $3M in Grants Awarded by Ball Brothers Foundation

By Jud Fisher, President/CEO, Ball Brothers Foundation—. MUNCIE, IN— Ball Brothers Foundation, a family foundation committed to place-based...

Read Article

March 26, 2025 07:00 AM

K2 Selected to Deliver Security Screening Checkpoint at New JFK Terminal 6

JFK Millennium Partners (JMP), the company selected by the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ) to build and operate John F.

Read Article

October 23, 2024 07:00 AM

Sculpture at Elanco campus expected to make a splash for public art

Water in Dripping, River,” a stainless steel sculpture by Chinese artist Zheng Lu, is an $846000 project that will set a new standard for...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…