Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Proxycare Limited » PRO1774989143

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1774989143)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-74
Company Score Before Incident759 / 1000
Company Score After Incident685 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPRO1774989143
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, personal...
INCIDENT DATE21/08/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Proxycare Limited's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Proxycare Limited Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Proxycare Limited breach identified under incident ID PRO1774989143.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Proxycare Limited's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/proxycare, the number of followers: 157, the industry type: Staffing and Recruiting and the number of employees: 25 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 685 with a difference of -74 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Proxycare Limited and their customers.

On 23 March 2026, ProxyCare Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "ProxyCare Data Breach Exposes Personal Health Information of 125 Massachusetts Residents".

ProxyCare Inc., a Florida-based pharmacy services company, disclosed a data breach on March 23, 2026, after detecting unauthorized access to its systems on August 22, 2025.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, personal health information, with nearly 125 records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Forensic analysis, manual review of impacted files, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written letters to affected individuals, public notice on website, dedicated toll-free response line.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Complimentary credit monitoring services offered to affected individuals with exposed Social Security numbers.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its systems on August 22, 2025 and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating proxyCare Inc. systems were accessed by unauthorized third party. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal health information, names, Social Security numbers compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating forensic analysis and manual review of impacted files. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating manual review of impacted files to assess the scope of the breach. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal health information, names, Social Security numbers accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach confirmed; personal health information acquired by unauthorized third party and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in high-sensitivity breach. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating forensic analysis conducted post-breach and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems; data integrity at risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References