Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1774989199)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Proxycare Pharmacy's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Proxycare Pharmacy Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Proxycare Pharmacy breach identified under incident ID PRO1774989199.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Proxycare Pharmacy's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/proxycare-pharmacy, the number of followers: 18, the industry type: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and the number of employees: 6 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 758 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -71 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Proxycare Pharmacy and their customers.
On 23 March 2026, Proxycare, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Proxycare, Inc. Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Health Information of Florida, Georgia, and Alabama Patients".
Proxycare, Inc., a Florida-based pharmacy services provider, experienced a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to sensitive health data, including personally identifiable information (PII) of patients in Florida, Georgia, and Alabama.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and sensitive health data, with nearly At least 125 (Massachusetts alone) records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications sent to affected individuals starting March 23, 2026.
The case underscores how Ongoing (forensic investigation completed, legal proceedings underway), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications sent to affected individuals starting March 23, 2026.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity within its network on August 22, 2025 and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating proxycare offers medication management solutions for long-term care. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating files containing sensitive health data had been accessed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers and names compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers exposed in the breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive health data had been accessed or acquired by unauthorized party. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity within its network detected and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data manipulation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Proxycare Pharmacy Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/proxycare-pharmacy/incident/PRO1774989199
- Proxycare Pharmacy CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/proxycare-pharmacy
- Proxycare Pharmacy Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/pro1774989199-proxycare-inc-breach-august-2025/
- Proxycare Pharmacy CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/proxycare-pharmacy/history
- Proxycare Pharmacy CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/proxycare-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf