Comparison Overview
Provecho
Provecho
N/A
Last Update: 03/04/2026
We believe cooking online should be easier. Much easier. There’s a couple obvious things: 1. Recipes should start with the recipe. Not a life story. 2. Pages should be simple and helpful. Not filled w/ ads. 3. Cook times should tell you how long it'll take to make. A...
VMware
3401 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, 94304, US
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Broadcom's VMware software manages cloud complexity so customers can modernize infrastructure, accelerate app development, and protect workloads, wherever these reside. Our flagship cloud solutions provide the security and performance of private cloud combined with the...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Provecho
VMware
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Provecho has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
VMware has 1272.55% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Provecho (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Provecho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VMware (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VMware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Provecho
VMware
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.