Company Details
prosura
11
598
52421
PROSURA.co.uk
0
PRO_2864417
In-progress


PROSURA Company CyberSecurity Posture
PROSURA.co.ukWe get it! Running your own business is tough. It’s not for the faint hearted and, at times it can be incredibly stressful and frustrating. As a business owner you want to focus on the “day job”: it’s about growing the business, looking after your team and serving your customers properly. Hard enough as it is, but far too much of your time is focussed on other stuff. Finding a partner to work with that you can trust to take away some of the administrative burden is like finding a needle in a haystack but, by finding Prosura, you’ve managed to pull that off as well! You deserve a partner that just “gets it done”. A partner that’s there for you and talks your language. A partner that you can communicate with in the way you choose whether that’s via WhatsApp, phone or email. Yes, we are an insurance broker but were much more than that. Welcome to Prosura. A thoroughly modern business with an old fashioned “service first” ethos. Contact us today to see the difference!
Company Details
prosura
11
598
52421
PROSURA.co.uk
0
PRO_2864417
In-progress
Between 650 and 699

PROSURA Global Score (TPRM)XXXX

Description: Prosura Insurance Hit by Cyberattack, Customer Data at Risk Australian and New Zealand insurer Prosura (also operating as Hiccup) has confirmed a cyberattack after a threat actor claimed to have stolen customer data and demanded a deal to prevent its release. The company, which provides rental car accident insurance, has temporarily suspended new policy sales and its online self-service portal while investigating the breach. Prosura detected unauthorized access to its systems on Saturday, revealing that compromised data may include names, email addresses, phone numbers, travel details, policy information, and claim-related documents, such as driver’s licenses and images. While the company stated that credit card details were not accessed as it does not store them it acknowledged that some customers received fraudulent emails related to older policies. The threat actor, who claimed to have breached Prosura’s systems on New Year’s Day, accused the company of ignoring earlier attempts to report the vulnerability. In an email sent to victims, the attacker referenced specific policy numbers and falsely offered a free "policy extension" dated January 3, pressuring Prosura to respond or face a full data leak. Prosura founder Mike Boyd confirmed that the attackers had used aggressive tactics, including direct contact with customers, and urged recipients to ignore suspicious messages. The company has notified authorities and implemented additional security measures but has not disclosed the number of affected customers. The breach follows a string of high-profile cyber incidents in Australia, including attacks on Optus (2022), HWL Ebsworth (2023), and Qantas (2025), highlighting persistent vulnerabilities in corporate cybersecurity. A New Zealand victim, who purchased Prosura insurance through the affiliated VroomVroomVroom rental comparison site in mid-2024, reported receiving the fraudulent email and expressed concerns over potential identity theft risks, particularly regarding exposed personal details like full names and dates of birth. Prosura has not provided further details on the breach, citing the ongoing investigation.


PROSURA has 66.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
PROSURA has 24.81% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
PROSURA reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
PROSURA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

We get it! Running your own business is tough. It’s not for the faint hearted and, at times it can be incredibly stressful and frustrating. As a business owner you want to focus on the “day job”: it’s about growing the business, looking after your team and serving your customers properly. Hard enough as it is, but far too much of your time is focussed on other stuff. Finding a partner to work with that you can trust to take away some of the administrative burden is like finding a needle in a haystack but, by finding Prosura, you’ve managed to pull that off as well! You deserve a partner that just “gets it done”. A partner that’s there for you and talks your language. A partner that you can communicate with in the way you choose whether that’s via WhatsApp, phone or email. Yes, we are an insurance broker but were much more than that. Welcome to Prosura. A thoroughly modern business with an old fashioned “service first” ethos. Contact us today to see the difference!


Insurance Management Company (IMC) has earned a national reputation for its unique business model for helping commercial, industrial and institutional clients better manage risk. Clients working closely with our associates, optimize the purchase of property, liability and workers compensation insura

Global Pacific Financial Services (GPFS) is a trusted Managing General Agency (MGA) committed to supporting independent financial advisors across Canada. For more than 49 years, we’ve partnered with advisors to help them deliver exceptional client outcomes while growing their practices with confiden

Fulcrum Risk Solutions is an independent, full-service brokerage firm dedicated to providing holistic risk management and insurance strategies to our clients. We foster organizational stability by implementing tailor-made population health management programs. By focusing on the physical and emotio

Headquartered in Concord Ontario, Mowen Insurance Brokers o/a A Division of Oracle RMS is a full-service insurance brokerage. Co-founders, Olimpia Sklad and Trevor Cation bring in over 15 years of experience with their team specializing in Business, Commercial Auto, Bonding, Group Benefits/Life and

Built by and for Arizona public sector employers, VSMG is a leading employee benefits consultant, dedicated exclusively to serving the needs of Arizona’s school districts, municipalities, and other public entities for over 19 years. With offices in Phoenix and in Tucson, we are committed to deliver

Alliant Private Client, a division of Alliant Insurance Services, manages the insurance needs of affluent individuals and families who require a sophisticated approach to personal risk management. Our focused review process, along with our long-standing industry relationships, allows us to provide c

Multichoice Insurance Services (MCIS) is one of the largest Visitor Insurance broker in the United States providing quality protection for hundreds of individuals, families and businesses worldwide. Providing superior customer service and lowest premium along with our ability to understand our custo

With our Group Health Insurance packages, businesses can enjoy a range of benefits such as customizable coverage options, competitive premium rates, and access to a wide network of healthcare providers. This ensures that employees are well taken care of and can focus on their work without worrying a

GEORG DUNCKER is one of the largest independent and privately-owned marine insurance brokers with more than 150 years of successful operation in the maritime sector. From our four office locations in Hamburg, Singapore, Houston and Rotterdam, more than 100 insurance professionals are serving over 3
.png)
The Cyber Express reports this week's cybersecurity news: school closures, corporate breaches, and government reforms.
Prosura attackers are selling data from 300000 customers after breaching the car rental insurer's systems. Driver's licenses and policy...
Australian insurance provider Prosura is investigating a cyber incident after detecting unauthorized access to parts of its internal systems...
Australian-based insurance provider Prosura has reported that it is responding to a cyber attack after some of its customers received...
Prosura is managing a cyber incident that resulted in unauthorised access to parts of its systems and a temporary shutdown of key customer...
Australians who have rented cars have been caught up in a cyber incident affecting excess insurer Prosura, with customers receiving modified...
Our daily alert provides boardroom and C-suite executives, CIOs, CSOs, CISOs, IT executives and cybersecurity professionals with a breaking news story we're...

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of PROSURA is http://www.PROSURA.co.uk.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 684, reflecting their Weak security posture.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, PROSURA is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,PROSURA is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
PROSURA operates primarily in the Insurance Agencies and Brokerages industry.
PROSURA employs approximately 11 people worldwide.
PROSURA presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
PROSURA’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 598 followers.
PROSURA is classified under the NAICS code 52421, which corresponds to Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.
No, PROSURA does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Yes, PROSURA maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/prosura.
As of January 22, 2026, Rankiteo reports that PROSURA has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
PROSURA has an estimated 170 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and law enforcement notified with yes (authorities notified), and containment measures with shut down sales of new policies and online self-service portal, additional security measures implemented, and remediation measures with urgent system review, vulnerability patching, and communication strategy with public statement on website, customer advisories about fraudulent emails..
Title: Prosura Customer Data Breach and Extortion Attempt
Description: Personal information belonging to customers of insurer Prosura has been obtained by a self-described 'threat actor', who has threatened to leak the data unless they strike a deal with the company. Prosura has shut down sales of new policies and its online self-service portal while investigating the incident.
Date Detected: 2025-01-04
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-01-06
Type: Data Breach, Extortion
Attack Vector: Unauthorised system access (vulnerability exploitation)
Threat Actor: Self-described threat actor (potentially initial access broker)
Motivation: Extortion, potential financial gain
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Unpatched vulnerability (claimed by threat actor).

Data Compromised: Names, email addresses, phone numbers, country of residency, travel destinations, invoicing and pricing data, policy start/end dates, claim data (driver's licences and related images)
Systems Affected: Prosura's internal systems, online self-service portal
Downtime: Sales of new policies and self-service portal shut down during investigation
Operational Impact: Disruption to policy sales and customer service operations
Customer Complaints: Customers received fraudulent emails and suspicious communications
Brand Reputation Impact: Negative publicity, loss of customer trust
Identity Theft Risk: High (exposure of PII, driver's licences)
Payment Information Risk: Low (credit card details not stored/accessed)
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Policy Details, Claim Data and .

Entity Name: Prosura (also trades as Hiccup)
Entity Type: Insurance company
Industry: Insurance (car excess insurance for rental vehicles)
Location: Australia, New Zealand

Entity Name: VroomVroomVroom
Entity Type: Car rental comparison website
Industry: Travel/Automotive (car rental comparison)
Location: Australia, New Zealand

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (authorities notified)
Containment Measures: Shut down sales of new policies and online self-service portal, additional security measures implemented
Remediation Measures: Urgent system review, vulnerability patching
Communication Strategy: Public statement on website, customer advisories about fraudulent emails
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Policy details, Claim data
Sensitivity of Data: High (driver's licences, names, contact details, travel data)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (threat actor claims to have obtained all consumer information)
Personally Identifiable Information: Names, email addresses, phone numbers, country of residency, driver's licences and related images
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Urgent system review, vulnerability patching.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by shut down sales of new policies and online self-service portal and additional security measures implemented.

Data Exfiltration: Yes

Regulatory Notifications: Yes (authorities notified)
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: ABC NewsDate Accessed: 2025-01-06.

Investigation Status: Ongoing
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public statement on website and customer advisories about fraudulent emails.

Stakeholder Advisories: Customers advised not to respond to suspicious emails/phone calls; authorities notified
Customer Advisories: Warning about fraudulent emails, generic response to breach inquiries
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Customers advised not to respond to suspicious emails/phone calls; authorities notified, Warning about fraudulent emails and generic response to breach inquiries.

Entry Point: Unpatched vulnerability (claimed by threat actor)
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Self-described threat actor (potentially initial access broker).
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-01-04.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-01-06.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, email addresses, phone numbers, country of residency, travel destinations, invoicing and pricing data, policy start/end dates and claim data (driver's licences and related images).
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Shut down sales of new policies and online self-service portal and additional security measures implemented.
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names, email addresses, phone numbers, country of residency, travel destinations, invoicing and pricing data, policy start/end dates and claim data (driver's licences and related images).
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is ABC News.
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Customers advised not to respond to suspicious emails/phone calls; authorities notified, .
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Warning about fraudulent emails and generic response to breach inquiries.
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Unpatched vulnerability (claimed by threat actor).
.png)
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.
FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.
The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.