Comparison Overview

PROSURA

VS

Alliant Private Client

PROSURA

Wakefield, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.PROSURA.co.uk

We get it! Running your own business is tough. It’s not for the faint hearted and, at times it can be incredibly stressful and frustrating. As a business owner you want to focus on the “day job”: it’s about growing the business, looking after your team and serving your customers properly. Hard enough as it is, but far too much of your time is focussed on other stuff. Finding a partner to work with that you can trust to take away some of the administrative burden is like finding a needle in a haystack but, by finding Prosura, you’ve managed to pull that off as well! You deserve a partner that just “gets it done”. A partner that’s there for you and talks your language. A partner that you can communicate with in the way you choose whether that’s via WhatsApp, phone or email. Yes, we are an insurance broker but were much more than that. Welcome to Prosura. A thoroughly modern business with an old fashioned “service first” ethos. Contact us today to see the difference!

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Alliant Private Client

18100 Von Karman Avenue, Irvine, 92612, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://alliantprivateclient.com/

Alliant Private Client, a division of Alliant Insurance Services, manages the insurance needs of affluent individuals and families who require a sophisticated approach to personal risk management. Our focused review process, along with our long-standing industry relationships, allows us to provide comprehensive and customized insurance solutions for a host of potential liabilities. The team’s expertise covers all types of vulnerabilities and exposures, in specialty areas, such as fine art and equine, and more traditional ones, like property, liability and life insurance. That is also why family offices, professional advisors, fine art consultants, wealth managers and others turn to our practice to address the risks and exposures of their successful clients. We have offices located around the country, 300+ professionals licensed in all 50 states and a 24/7 dedicated claims team.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosura.jpeg
PROSURA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliantprivateclient.jpeg
Alliant Private Client
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PROSURA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alliant Private Client
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

PROSURA has 66.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alliant Private Client in 2026.

Incident History — PROSURA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PROSURA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alliant Private Client (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alliant Private Client cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosura.jpeg
PROSURA
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorised system access (vulnerability exploitation)
Motivation: Extortion, potential financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliantprivateclient.jpeg
Alliant Private Client
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alliant Private Client company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PROSURA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PROSURA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Alliant Private Client company has not reported any.

In the current year, PROSURA company has reported more cyber incidents than Alliant Private Client company.

Neither Alliant Private Client company nor PROSURA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PROSURA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Alliant Private Client company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Alliant Private Client company nor PROSURA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PROSURA company nor Alliant Private Client company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alliant Private Client company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PROSURA company.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PROSURA nor Alliant Private Client holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References