Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » ProMedica » PRO1785212666

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1785212666)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-59
Company Score Before Incident777 / 1000
Company Score After Incident718 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPRO1785212666
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and medical information
INCIDENT DATE23/06/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of ProMedica's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts ProMedica Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the ProMedica breach identified under incident ID PRO1785212666.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of ProMedica's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/promedica, the number of followers: 44772, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 9882 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 777 and after the incident was 718 with a difference of -59 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on ProMedica and their customers.

On 13 July 2026, Wildwood Surgical Center disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Wildwood Surgical Center Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".

On June 26, 2025, Wildwood Surgical Center detected unauthorized access to its network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Network, and exposing Sensitive personal and medical information.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters sent to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized access to its network, and third party gained entry and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating detected unauthorized access to its network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exfiltrated sensitive personal data and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, dates of birth, medical billing data compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating diagnostic and treatment details, health insurance information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exfiltrated sensitive personal data and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third party gained entry and potentially exfiltrated data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its network and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating heightened risks of identity theft and fraud. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)