Comparison Overview
Project Insight

Project Insight
5281 California Ave, Irvine, 92617, US
Last Update: 11/03/2026
Project Insight is award-winning project portfolio management software that centralizes your work, tasks, projects, and collaboration in one easy-to-use online platform. Get real-time visibility into your entire portfolio – budgeting, time tracking, issues, approvals, e...

PayPal
2211 North First Street, San Jose, CA, US, 95131
Last Update: 26/06/2026
We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Project Insight







PayPal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Project Insight in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
PayPal has 466.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Project Insight (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Project Insight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Project Insight

PayPal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.