Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Project InsightProject Insight
VS
PayPalPayPal
Project Insight

Project Insight

5281 California Ave, Irvine, 92617, US

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
703/1000Moderate

Project Insight is award-winning project portfolio management software that centralizes your work, tasks, projects, and collaboration in one easy-to-use online platform. Get real-time visibility into your entire portfolio – budgeting, time tracking, issues, approvals, e...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
PayPal

PayPal

2211 North First Street, San Jose, CA, US, 95131

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
548/1000Critical

We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:36,670
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Project Insight

Project Insight

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PayPal

PayPal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Insight in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

PayPal has 466.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Project Insight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Insight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Project Insight

Project Insight

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GENPRO1772485033
PayPal

PayPal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NORPAYSHOAPPMCA1782469522
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LIVPAY1773735888
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY1771967012

FAQ

Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Project Insight company and PayPal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Project Insight and PayPal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Project Insight and PayPal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Project Insight or PayPal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Project Insight or PayPal ?
Between Project Insight and PayPal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Project Insight and PayPal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA