Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Progress Kemp LoadMaster » PRO1782829753

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1782829753)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident749 / 1000
Company LinkView Progress Kemp LoadMaster Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERPRO1782829753
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORRemote
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE03/06/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Progress Kemp LoadMaster's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Progress Kemp LoadMaster Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Progress Kemp LoadMaster breach identified under incident ID PRO1782829753.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Progress Kemp LoadMaster's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/progresskemploadmaster, the number of followers: 19741, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 93 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 749 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Progress Kemp LoadMaster and their customers.

On 04 June 2026, Progress Kemp LoadMaster disclosed Zero-Day Vulnerability issues under the banner "Critical Zero-Day Vulnerability in Progress Kemp LoadMaster Exposes Enterprise Networks".

A severe security flaw in Progress Kemp LoadMaster, tracked as CVE-2026-8037, has left enterprise networks worldwide vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Kemp LoadMaster, Progress ECS Connection Manager, Progress Connection Manager for ObjectScale.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Upgrade to patched versions (GA 7.2.63.2 or LTSF 7.2.54.18), and began remediation that includes Switch to zero-filled memory allocation and add missing null terminator.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Organizations running affected versions are advised to upgrade immediately to patched versions (GA 7.2.63.2 or LTSF 7.2.54.18). Those without active maintenance agreements should contact their vendor for updates.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including severe security flaw in Progress Kemp LoadMaster...allows unauthenticated remote code execution, and exploitation provides attackers with a direct pathway into an organization’s infrastructure. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including execute arbitrary commands with root-level privileges, and inject malicious commands via the /accessv2 API endpoint. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating execute arbitrary commands with root-level privileges without requiring authentication. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with moderate to high confidence (85%), with evidence including bypassing internal security controls, and exploitation occurs via the /accessv2 API endpoint and Indicator Removal (T1066) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating missing null terminator in the escape_quotes() function allows memory manipulation. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating devices often sit at the network perimeter, providing a direct pathway into infrastructure. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (95%)
Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter (90%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (90%)
Defense Evasion
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (85%)
Indicator Removal (70%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (80%)

Sources & References