Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1764720797)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Progressive Leasing's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Progressive Leasing Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Progressive Leasing breach identified under incident ID PRO1764720797.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Progressive Leasing's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/progressive-leasing, the number of followers: 11161, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 1361 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 615 and after the incident was 458 with a difference of -157 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Progressive Leasing and their customers.
On 23 October 2023, Prog Leasing LLC (Progressive Leasing) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Progressive Leasing $3.25M Data Breach Settlement".
A third party gained unauthorized access to certain Progressive Leasing systems, potentially exposing the personal information of customers.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information, with nearly 216,000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $3.25M settlement.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Data breach notice sent to affected individuals.
The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Data breach notice sent to affected individuals.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third party gained unauthorized access to certain Progressive Leasing systems and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating negligent data security practices may imply weak account controls. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exposing the personal information of customers (216,000 records). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating negligent data security practices may imply exposed credentials. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware, but data exposure implies impact and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems may imply data tampering risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Progressive Leasing Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/progressive-leasing/incident/PRO1764720797
- Progressive Leasing CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/progressive-leasing
- Progressive Leasing Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/pro1764720797-progressive-leasing-breach-december-2025/
- Progressive Leasing CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/progressive-leasing/history
- Progressive Leasing CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/settlements/pl-data-settlement
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf