Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Progressive Independent Agents » PRO1771972264

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1771972264)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-79
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident675 / 1000
Company LinkView Progressive Independent Agents Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERPRO1771972264
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSocial Security numbers, driver’s license...
INCIDENT DATE19/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Progressive Independent Agents's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Progressive Independent Agents Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Progressive Independent Agents breach identified under incident ID PRO1771972264.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Progressive Independent Agents's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/progressive-independent-agents, the number of followers: 5559, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 675 with a difference of -79 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Progressive Independent Agents and their customers.

On 01 December 2025, Progressive Auto Group disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Progressive Auto Group Data Breach and Delayed Notifications".

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Progressive Auto Group following a data breach that exposed sensitive customer information.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, debit card details, and banking information, with nearly 1680 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Delayed notifications (7 months after breach).

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering One year of free credit monitoring offered to impacted individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach that exposed sensitive customer information via dealership systems and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hacking group Nitrogen allegedly carried out the breach. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating exposed Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hacking group Nitrogen targeted dealership systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, debit card details and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 1,680 individuals affected; banking information compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 1,680 individuals; identity theft reported and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hacking group Nitrogen likely exfiltrated data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft and credit reduction reported by plaintiff and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating customer experienced credit reduction post-breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (40%)
Brute Force (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References