Comparison Overview
Progress Sitefinity

Progress Sitefinity
15 Wayside Rd, Burlington, 01803, US
Last Update: 28/02/2026
Progress Sitefinity is the AI-powered CMS at the heart of the Progress DXP - built to help teams move faster and smarter. Developers get freedom: .NET Core, Next.js and modern APIs support composable, headless or hybrid delivery—on your terms. IT gets peace of mind:...

ServiceNow
2225 Lawson Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 03/10/2026
ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) makes the world work better for everyone. Our cloud-based platform and solutions help digitize and unify organizations so that they can find smarter, faster, better ways to make work flow. So employees and customers can be more connected, more inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Progress Sitefinity







ServiceNow






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Progress Sitefinity in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
ServiceNow has 593.07% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Progress Sitefinity (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Progress Sitefinity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ServiceNow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ServiceNow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Progress Sitefinity

ServiceNow
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.