Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Progress Foundation » PRO1771000800

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRO1771000800)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-67
Company Score Before Incident757 / 1000
Company Score After Incident690 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPRO1771000800
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDW2 forms, names, Social Security...
INCIDENT DATE01/02/2026
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Progress Foundation's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Progress Foundation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Progress Foundation breach identified under incident ID PRO1771000800.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Progress Foundation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/progress-foundation, the number of followers: 1301, the industry type: Mental Health Care and the number of employees: 315 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 757 and after the incident was 690 with a difference of -67 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Progress Foundation and their customers.

On 12 February 2026, Progress Foundation disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Progress Foundation Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Employee Information".

Progress Foundation, a San Francisco-based nonprofit providing mental health rehabilitation and recovery services, suffered a data breach when employees’ W2 forms were accidentally disclosed to an unauthorized party.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing W2 forms, names, Social Security numbers.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating w2 forms were accidentally disclosed to an unauthorized party and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating employee W2 forms were disclosed (implies insider/authorized access). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating w2 forms containing names and Social Security numbers exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating employee W2 forms and personally identifiable information compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating data breach with no details on exfiltration method and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party received disclosed W2 forms. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed Social Security numbers put individuals at risk of identity theft. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (30%)
Valid Accounts (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (30%)
Impact
Compromise Accounts (70%)

Sources & References