Comparison Overview
Procreate
Procreate
304 Elizabeth Street, North Hobart, Tasmania, AU, 7000
Last Update: 22/02/2026
We’ve been developing creative tools for iPad and iPhone since 2011. Our apps, Procreate, Procreate Dreams, and Procreate Pocket, have reached and stayed at #1 in Apple’s App Store for over eight years. Independently owned, based in a beautiful pocket of Australia, we ...
Amazon
2127 7th Ave., Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Amazon is guided by four principles: customer obsession rather than competitor focus, passion for invention, commitment to operational excellence, and long-term thinking. We are driven by the excitement of building technologies, inventing products, and providing service...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Procreate
Amazon
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Procreate in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Amazon has 1076.47% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Procreate (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Procreate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Amazon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amazon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Procreate
Amazon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.