Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Princess Cruises » CARPRI1779920714

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CARPRI1779920714)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-56
Company Score Before Incident779 / 1000
Company Score After Incident723 / 1000
Company LinkView Princess Cruises Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCARPRI1779920714
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORSocial Engineering
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal data, including names, addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Princess Cruises's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Princess Cruises Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Princess Cruises breach identified under incident ID CARPRI1779920714.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Princess Cruises's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/princess-cruises, the number of followers: 368970, the industry type: Travel Arrangements and the number of employees: 15418 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 779 and after the incident was 723 with a difference of -56 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Princess Cruises and their customers.

On 27 May 2024, Carnival Corporation disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Carnival Corp. Employee Account Compromise".

Carnival Corporation disclosed a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to an employee’s account through social engineering tactics, leading to the exposure of personal data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data, including names, addresses, and government-issued identification numbers.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Blocked further unauthorized activity, and began remediation that includes Enhanced security protocols and monitoring controls, and stakeholders are being briefed through Affected individuals notified via email.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Further enhancements in IT and data protection measures, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals offered two years of free credit monitoring through TransUnion.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including executed through social engineering tactics, and unauthorized access to an employee’s account and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social engineering tactics leading to employee account compromise. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including unauthorized access to an employee’s account, and employee account compromise. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of personal data, including names, addresses, and government-issued identification numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal data breach involving employee account compromise. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating employee account compromise leading to data exposure and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data manipulation. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access via compromised employee account. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (70%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Compromise Accounts (80%)
Data Destruction (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)

Sources & References