Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Precision Imaging Partners » PRE1786448077

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRE1786448077)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident687 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPRE1786448077
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDProtected health information (PHI)
INCIDENT DATE06/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Precision Imaging Partners's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Precision Imaging Partners Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Precision Imaging Partners breach identified under incident ID PRE1786448077.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Precision Imaging Partners's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/precisionimagingpartners, the number of followers: 1266, the industry type: Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories and the number of employees: 103 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Precision Imaging Partners and their customers.

On 06 July 2026, Precision Imaging Center disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Precision Imaging Center Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".

Precision Imaging Center detected suspicious activity within its network on May 7, 2026.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Protected health information (PHI).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Systems secured, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice letters to be mailed to impacted patients.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notice letters to be mailed to impacted patients.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated files and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity within its network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed...protected health information (PHI). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing protected health information (PHI) exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated files and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach with high identity theft risk. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity within its network and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating protected health information (PHI) compromised. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References