Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRE1770197652)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Precipio, Inc.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Precipio, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Precipio, Inc. breach identified under incident ID PRE1770197652.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Precipio, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/precipio-diagnostics, the number of followers: 2694, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 80 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 657 with a difference of -104 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Precipio, Inc. and their customers.
On 02 December 2025, Precipio, Inc. disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Precipio Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information in Ransomware Attack".
Precipio, Inc., a Connecticut-based healthcare biotechnology company specializing in cancer diagnostics, confirmed a data breach after an unauthorized user accessed an employee’s cloud storage account.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 150 GB of data.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals may be eligible for compensation.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized user accessed an employee’s cloud storage account. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accessed an employee’s cloud storage account (likely via stolen credentials/tokens) and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit evidence, but cloud account compromise suggests possible brute force. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files were illicitly copied from cloud storage (150 GB of data) and Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cloud storage account accessed (likely SharePoint/OneDrive). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 150 GB of data stolen; INC RANSOM claimed responsibility and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data posted on dark web (likely exfiltrated via cloud services). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating iNC RANSOM is a ransomware group (implied encryption) and Defacement: External Defacement (T1491.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating iNC RANSOM posted details on the dark web. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating used compromised employee cloud account to evade detection and Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (T1564.008) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit evidence, but cloud account abuse may involve hiding artifacts. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Precipio, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/precipio-diagnostics/incident/PRE1770197652
- Precipio, Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/precipio-diagnostics
- Precipio, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/pre1770197652-precipio-inc-ransomware-november-2025/
- Precipio, Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/precipio-diagnostics/history
- Precipio, Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/precipio-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf