Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Powercom (Pty) LtdPowercom (Pty) Ltd
VS
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Powercom (Pty) Ltd

No 6, Robert Mugabe Avenue, Windhoek, NA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.powercom.na
635/1000Poor

PowerCom is an ICT infrastructure and equipment provider. The company is a subsidiary of Telecom Namibia Limited since 2013. PowerCom's services is currently focused on telecommunications infrastructure namely Towers , with a portfolio of over 300 towers and 29 roof ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Avenida Eng. Luís Carlos Berrini, 1376, São Paulo, 04571 - 000, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.vivo.com.br
800/1000Good

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of p...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:38,994
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Powercom (Pty) Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Powercom (Pty) Ltd has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Powercom (Pty) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Powercom (Pty) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Powercom (Pty) Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Powercom (Pty) Ltd or Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Powercom (Pty) Ltd or Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Powercom (Pty) Ltd and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA