ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of products, combining fixed, mobile and digital services. Our purpose is “Digitalize to Bring Closer”, helping to build a digital nation and transforming the life of our customers. More and more, we connect people and things with Fiber, 4G and 4.5G and cover more cities with the network quality that only Vivo has. Today, we cover around 90% of the population with 4G and are accelerating the launch of cities with 4.5G, using carrier aggregation technology. In the fixed operation, we ended 2019 with 21 million homes-passed (HPs) with fiber optic technology, of which 11 million HPs with FTTH (fiber to the home). In addition, all cities with FTTH technology also offer TV over fiber (IPTV), aiming to offer the best speed and experience to our consumers. At Vivo, we also do more than just telecommunications. Within the Group, we have the Telefônica Vivo Foundation, that is committed to making education a priority, developing projects that are based on human potential and use technology as an instrument in favor of inclusion and digital culture.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

V

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

vivo-telefonicabr

Employees number:

37,866

Number of followers:

1,503,344

NAICS:

517

Industry Type:

Telecommunications

Homepage:

vivo.com.br

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

VIV_1616504

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreV Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivo-telefonicabr.jpeg
V Telecommunications
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreV Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivo-telefonicabr.jpeg
V Telecommunications
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

V Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
TelefónicaRansomware1005/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A cybercriminal known as Rey, part of the Hellcat ransomware operation, claims to have stolen 106GB of sensitive data from Telefónica in May 2025. The stolen data includes internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records, and various employee data. Rey has released a 2.6GB sample and is threatening to release the full batch unless a payment is made. Telefónica has downplayed the incident, stating that the data is old and there was no new breach.

Telefónica
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact:
Seen: 5/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A cybercriminal known as Rey, part of the Hellcat ransomware operation, claims to have stolen 106GB of sensitive data from Telefónica in May 2025. The stolen data includes internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records, and various employee data. Rey has released a 2.6GB sample and is threatening to release the full batch unless a payment is made. Telefónica has downplayed the incident, stating that the data is old and there was no new breach.

Ailogo

V Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for V

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2025.

Incident Types V vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2025.

Incident History — V (X = Date, Y = Severity)

V cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

V Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of products, combining fixed, mobile and digital services. Our purpose is “Digitalize to Bring Closer”, helping to build a digital nation and transforming the life of our customers. More and more, we connect people and things with Fiber, 4G and 4.5G and cover more cities with the network quality that only Vivo has. Today, we cover around 90% of the population with 4G and are accelerating the launch of cities with 4.5G, using carrier aggregation technology. In the fixed operation, we ended 2019 with 21 million homes-passed (HPs) with fiber optic technology, of which 11 million HPs with FTTH (fiber to the home). In addition, all cities with FTTH technology also offer TV over fiber (IPTV), aiming to offer the best speed and experience to our consumers. At Vivo, we also do more than just telecommunications. Within the Group, we have the Telefônica Vivo Foundation, that is committed to making education a priority, developing projects that are based on human potential and use technology as an instrument in favor of inclusion and digital culture.

Loading...
similarCompanies

V Similar Companies

Make a new start. A start that will build beautiful relationships, shape millions of ideas. Enable a new way to live, learn, work and play. At Jio, we build products and services of the future to empower billions of Indians make their dreams a reality. Jio is about YOU. Join the movement to make I

Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited is an Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group partnership. It is India’s leading telecom service provider. The Company provides pan India Voice and Data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platform. With the large spectrum portfolio to support the growing demand for data and voice, the

Telkom Business

Telkom Business is the business unit dedicated to serving businesses of every type, industry and size in and outside South Africa. The businesses that we serve range from small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to large corporations, government organisations and global enterprises. A sub-brand of the

Bouygues Telecom

🤝Ce qui fait notre singularité ? Chez Bouygues Telecom, nous croyons que les relations humaines sont un besoin vital. La qualité de nos relations avec notre famille, nos amis, ceux qui nous entourent est déterminante pour notre bien-être, notre santé et même notre espérance de vie. Ce sont ces rela

We believe it’s people who give purpose to our technology. So we’re committed to staying close to our customers and providing them the best experience. And delivering the best tech. On the best network. Because our purpose is to build a connected future so everyone can thrive. We build techno

ACN is the leading direct selling telecommunications and essential services provider. ACN Inc. was founded in 1993 by four entrepreneurs and is now operating in North America. ACN offers essential products and services that people use every day, while also offering a powerful business ownership oppo

Ericsson

The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological shift; it’s a transformation th

T-Mobile

T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is America’s supercharged Un-carrier, delivering an advanced 4G LTE and transformative nationwide 5G network that will offer reliable connectivity for all. T-Mobile’s customers benefit from its unmatched combination of value and quality, unwavering obsession with off

Spectrum

Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTR) is a leading broadband connectivity company and cable operator with services available to more than 57 million homes and businesses in 41 states through its Spectrum brand. Over an advanced communications network, the company offers a full range of state-o

newsone

V CyberSecurity News

August 11, 2025 07:00 AM
Telefónica|Vivo advances B2B goal with landmark €600m São Paulo IoT contract

Telefónica|Vivo has closed a BRL 3.8bn (€600m) Internet of Things contract with public sanitation services provider Sabesp, which will see...

June 27, 2025 07:00 AM
Telefonica Brasil: A Solid Strategy To Hold And Grow

Telefônica Brasil dominates Brazil's telecom market with rapid 5G expansion, strong financial growth, and an expanding fintech ecosystem.

May 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Vivo connects 700 Magalu stores across Brazil

Brazilian operator Vivo (Telefonica Brasil) has become Magalu's primary digital partner, connecting 700 of the retailer's stores across...

May 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Vivo reports 18% higher net profit in Q1 to BRL 1.1 billion

Brazil's Vivo (Telefonica Brasil) reported a net profit of BRL 1.1 billion in Q1 2025, marking an 18.1 percent increase compared to the same period last year.

October 03, 2024 07:00 AM
Brazil’s Vivo eyes more B2B M&A after closing out IPNET buy

Telefónica|Vivo has finalised its acquisition of Brazilian cloud services provider IPNET after receiving relevant regulatory approvals for...

September 04, 2024 07:00 AM
Brazil’s Vivo gets Central Bank nod to expand in fintech

The Banco Central do Brasil (Central Bank of Brazil) has granted Telefónica|Vivo a Sociedade de Crédito Direto (SCD) licence,...

August 20, 2024 07:00 AM
Telefónica Peoplewatch: key directorship changes in Germany and UK

The Group has reportedly restructured the Board of Directors at Telefónica Open Innovation, parent to corporate venture capital and...

March 12, 2024 07:00 AM
Vivo affirms loyalty payback of ‘beyond telco’ strategy

Telefónica|Vivo is to continue branching out into new, non-telco sectors such as energy, finance, and health as a strategy to drive customer...

November 29, 2023 08:00 AM
Telefónica Tech incorporates Alejandro Ramos as ‘country manager’ of Brazil

... • With more than twenty years of experience in cybersecurity, Ramos will strengthen Telefónica Tech's capabilities in the Americas,...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

V CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

The official website of Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is http://www.vivo.com.br.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 796, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) operates primarily in the Telecommunications industry.

Number of Employees at Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) employs approximately 37,866 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’s LinkedIn Followers

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,503,344 followers.

NAICS Classification of Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is classified under the NAICS code 517, which corresponds to Telecommunications.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/vivo-telefonicabr.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) has an estimated 9,535 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.

How does Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with null, and third party assistance with null, and law enforcement notified with null, and containment measures with null, and remediation measures with null, and recovery measures with null, and communication strategy with null, and adaptive behavioral waf with null, and on demand scrubbing services with null, and network segmentation with null, and enhanced monitoring with null..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Telefónica Data Breach Incident

Description: A threat actor claims to have stolen 106GB of sensitive files from Telefónica. The company asserts the files were old and stolen from a previous incident. A sample was shared with the media, with the full batch soon to follow.

Date Detected: null

Date Publicly Disclosed: null

Date Resolved: null

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Internal Jira development and ticketing server

Vulnerability Exploited: null

Threat Actor: Hellcat ransomware operation, alias Rey

Motivation: Ransom

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Internal Jira development and ticketing server.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Financial Loss: null

Data Compromised: 106GB of sensitive files, including internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records, and employee data

Systems Affected: Internal Jira development and ticketing server

Downtime: null

Operational Impact: null

Conversion Rate Impact: null

Revenue Loss: null

Customer Complaints: null

Brand Reputation Impact: null

Legal Liabilities: null

Identity Theft Risk: null

Payment Information Risk: null

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records and and employee data.

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Entity Name: Telefónica

Entity Type: Telecommunications Company

Industry: Telecommunications

Location: Spain

Size: null

Customers Affected: null

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Incident Response Plan Activated: null

Third Party Assistance: null

Law Enforcement Notified: null

Containment Measures: null

Remediation Measures: null

Recovery Measures: null

Communication Strategy: null

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: null

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: null

Network Segmentation: null

Enhanced Monitoring: null

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as null.

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through null.

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Type of Data Compromised: Internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records, and employee data

Number of Records Exposed: 380,000 files

Sensitivity of Data: Sensitive

Data Exfiltration: 106GB

Data Encryption: null

File Types Exposed: Invoices, email addresses, internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records, and employee data

Personally Identifiable Information: Email addresses, invoices for business partners or customers

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: null.

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by null.

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Ransom Demanded: null

Ransom Paid: null

Ransomware Strain: Hellcat

Data Encryption: null

Data Exfiltration: 106GB

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through null.

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Regulations Violated: null

Fines Imposed: null

Legal Actions: null

Regulatory Notifications: null

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through null.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Lessons Learned: null

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Recommendations: null

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are null.

What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: null.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Source: BleepingComputer

URL: null

Date Accessed: null

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: nullDate Accessed: null.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Investigation Status: null

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through null.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Stakeholder Advisories: null

Customer Advisories: null

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were null and null.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Entry Point: Internal Jira development and ticketing server

Reconnaissance Period: null

Backdoors Established: null

High Value Targets: null

Data Sold on Dark Web: null

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach TEL732070725

Root Causes: null

Corrective Actions: null

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as null, null.

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: null.

Additional Questions

General Information

Has the company ever paid ransoms ?

Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.

What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was null.

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Hellcat ransomware operation and alias Rey.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on null.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on null.

What was the most recent incident resolved ?

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on null.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was null.

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were 106GB of sensitive files, including internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records and and employee data.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was null.

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was null.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were 106GB of sensitive files, including internal communications, purchase orders, logs, customer records and and employee data.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 380.0K.

Ransomware Information

What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was null.

What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was null.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was null.

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was null.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was null.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was null.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is BleepingComputer.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is null .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is null.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was null, .

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an null.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Internal Jira development and ticketing server.

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was null.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=vivo-telefonicabr' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge