Comparison Overview
Porto de São Sebastião
Porto de São Sebastião
Avenida Doutor Altino Arantes, 372, São Sebastião, SP, 11608-623, BR
Last Update: 14/02/2026
O Porto de São Sebastião é administrado pela Companhia Docas de São Sebastião, empresa vinculada à Secretaria de Meio Ambiente, Infraestrutura e Logística de São Paulo. É uma delegação federal ao Governo do Estado de São Paulo, sendo, portanto, um porto público. O por...
Transnet SOC Ltd
138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 03/04/2026
As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Porto de São Sebastião
Transnet SOC Ltd
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Porto de São Sebastião in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Transnet SOC Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - Porto de São Sebastião (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Porto de São Sebastião cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Porto de São Sebastião
Transnet SOC Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.