What is the official website of Portland State University Foundation ?

The official website of Portland State University Foundation is http://www.psuf.org/.

What is Portland State University Foundation's cybersecurity risk score?

Portland State University Foundation has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 758 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Portland State University Foundation experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Portland State University Foundation been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Portland State University Foundation have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Portland State University Foundation have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Portland State University Foundation comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Portland State University Foundation have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Portland State University Foundation comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Portland State University Foundation is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Portland State University Foundation have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Portland State University Foundation is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Portland State University Foundation operate in ?

Portland State University Foundation operates primarily in the Philanthropic Fundraising Services industry.

How many employees does Portland State University Foundation have ?

Portland State University Foundation employs approximately 72 people worldwide.

Does Portland State University Foundation own any subsidiaries ?

Portland State University Foundation presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Portland State University Foundation have ?

Portland State University Foundation's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,112 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Portland State University Foundation ?

Portland State University Foundation is classified under the NAICS code 8132, which corresponds to Grantmaking and Giving Services.

Does Portland State University Foundation have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Portland State University Foundation does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Portland State University Foundation have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Portland State University Foundation maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/portland-state-university-foundation.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Portland State University Foundation experienced ?

As of July 26, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Portland State University Foundation has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Portland State University Foundation have ?

Portland State University Foundation has an estimated 1,809 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Portland State University Foundation faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

PSUF

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

758

/1000

Fair

783

/1000

Fair

Portland State University Foundation Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

psuf.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

Our mission is to inspire donors, engage alumni and community, and steward resources to support and enhance Portland State University’s vital impact.

PSUF A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

PSUF

Portland State University Foundation CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Portland State Univ...

Cyber Attack

5/2020

POR050072425

Loading…

A.I.

PSUF Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PSUF

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland State University Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland State University Foundation in 2026.

Incident Types PSUF vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland State University Foundation in 2026.

Incident History - PSUF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Portland State University Foundation Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PSUF

Philanthropic Fundraising Services

Website: http://www.psuf.org/

Company Size: 51-200 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Portland State University Foundation Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Portland State University Foundation CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 31, 2026 08:00 AM

Dr. Madhu Gottumukkala education qualifications: The Indian-origin IT expert leading US cybersecurity at

News News: Dr. Madhu Gottumukkala, the Acting Director and Deputy Director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency...

Read Article

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM

Eastern Connecticut State University Officially Starts New Cybersecurity Minor

WILLIMANTIC, CT — Eastern Connecticut State University launched a new cybersecurity minor in the fall 2025 semester.

Read Article

February 13, 2025 08:00 AM

The Top 10 Best Colleges in Portland for Tech Enthusiasts in 2025

Top colleges include Oregon Institute of Technology with a 92% employment rate and Portland State University, known for its 150+ industry connections.

Read Article

August 14, 2024 07:00 AM

WETO and the National Science Foundation Award Funding to Accelerate Floating Offshore Wind Research

Johns Hopkins University and Portland State University received funding from the National Science Foundation and WETO on a project that will...

Read Article

February 11, 2024 08:00 AM

Portland State plans to become destination school for Indigenous doctorate students

A destination university for Indigenous doctoral students in mathematics, statistics, physical sciences, engineering and computer science.

Read Article

November 01, 2023 07:00 AM

Top 10 Chief Information Security Officers

Cyber Magazine features 10 global CISOs who are leading the charge in cybersecurity innovation, governance, and resilience.

Read Article

January 26, 2023 08:00 AM

Oregon State cybersecurity grant to help address national, local worker shortage

Cameron McCawley is excited about studying cybersecurity because of the challenge it provides. “It's really rewarding,” McCawley,...

Read Article

January 13, 2023 08:00 AM

Bowie State receives $2.1M NSF grant to train and then funnel students into federal cybersecurity jobs

Maryland's oldest historically Black university is the latest local institution to be accepted into the National Science Foundation's...

Read Article

May 18, 2021 07:00 AM

Retrofitted Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex renderings released

The retrofitted complex will expand capacity from 3500 to about 9000 seats.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-10681

SUMMARY

In Zephyr's userspace dynamic-objects subsystem, thread_idx_alloc() in kernel/userspace/userspace.c allocated a new thread permission index from the global _thread_idx_map[] bitmap without holding lists_lock. On SMP systems, two user-mode threads invoking the k_object_alloc(K_OBJ_THREAD) syscall concurrently can both observe the same low free bit, perform the same non-atomic RMW to clear it, and return the identical tidx. The two newly created K_OBJ_THREAD objects are then assigned the same thread_id, so the two user threads alias a single bit position in every kernel object's perms[] bitfield: any subsequent grant of access on a kernel object to one thread is implicitly a grant to the other, defeating userspace ACL isolation. A secondary lost-update window between the unlocked &=~BIT() in alloc and the locked |= BIT() in thread_idx_free() can also leak entries from the thread-index pool. The defect is reachable from any user-mode thread via the unrestricted __syscall k_object_alloc and is gated on CONFIG_USERSPACE, CONFIG_DYNAMIC_OBJECTS, and CONFIG_SMP. The flaw was introduced when the per-thread permission index was added in 2018 and is present in every release up to and including v4.4.0. Fixed by holding lists_lock across the bitmap RMW and the permissions clear (and inlining the obj_list traversal that previously took the lock itself).

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

5.5

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66013

SUMMARY

OpenRemote before 1.26.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the console registration API that allows unauthenticated attackers to update existing console assets by supplying a known asset identifier. Attackers can overwrite push notification tokens and console metadata without authentication or ownership validation, redirecting notifications or denying delivery to legitimate consoles.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66012

SUMMARY

SiYuan before v3.7.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the POST /mcp kernel endpoint, which is gated only by a general auth check (model.CheckAuth) with no admin-role or read-only enforcement. This exposes 31 MCP tools, including a file tool with list/read/write/delete/rename/copy actions across the entire workspace. When the Publish server is enabled in anonymous mode (Conf.Publish.Enable=true and Conf.Publish.Auth.Enable=false), the Publish reverse proxy attaches an anonymous RoleReader JWT to proxied requests, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to reach /mcp. The attacker can read conf/conf.json to extract accessAuthCode, api.token, and cookieKey in plaintext, write arbitrary files in the workspace, and plant a plugin into data/plugins/ that executes with nodeIntegration:true and no contextIsolation on the next desktop launch, leading to administrator takeover.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)

cvss3

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66011

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-27 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the magick command-line interface when invalid options are provided. Attackers can trigger memory exhaustion by repeatedly supplying malformed command-line arguments to consume system resources.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64529

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - remove unused character device and IOCTLs The QAT driver exposes a character device (qat_adf_ctl) with IOCTLs for device configuration, start, stop, status query and enumeration. These IOCTLs are not part of any public uAPI header and have no known in-tree or out-of-tree users. Device lifecycle is already managed via sysfs. The ioctl interface also increases the attack surface and is the subject of a number of bug reports. Remove the character device, the IOCTL definitions, and the related data structures (adf_dev_status_info, adf_user_cfg_key_val, adf_user_cfg_section, adf_user_cfg_ctl_data). Drop the now-unused adf_cfg_user.h header and strip adf_ctl_drv.c down to the minimal module_init/module_exit hooks for workqueue, AER, and crypto/compression algorithm registration. Clean up leftover dead code that was only reachable from the removed IOCTL paths: adf_cfg_del_all(), adf_devmgr_verify_id(), adf_devmgr_get_num_dev(), adf_devmgr_get_dev_by_id(), adf_get_vf_real_id() and the unused ADF_CFG macros. Additionally, drop the entry associated to QAT IOCTLs in ioctl-number.rst.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…