What is the official website of Popular Photography ?

The official website of Popular Photography is http://www.popphoto.com/.

What is Popular Photography's cybersecurity risk score?

Popular Photography has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 750 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Popular Photography experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Popular Photography been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Popular Photography have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Popular Photography have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Popular Photography comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Popular Photography have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Popular Photography comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Popular Photography is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Popular Photography have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Popular Photography is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Popular Photography operate in ?

Popular Photography operates primarily in the Photography industry.

How many employees does Popular Photography have ?

Popular Photography employs approximately 12 people worldwide.

Does Popular Photography own any subsidiaries ?

Popular Photography presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Popular Photography have ?

Popular Photography's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 189 followers.

Does Popular Photography have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Popular Photography does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Popular Photography have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Popular Photography maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pop-photo.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Popular Photography experienced ?

As of July 12, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Popular Photography has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Popular Photography have ?

Popular Photography has an estimated 2,462 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Popular Photography

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

750

/1000

Fair

775

/1000

Fair

Popular Photography Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

popphoto.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Popular Photography is the world's largest photography magazine and the leading technical authority, buyers guide, and how-to resource for the photo enthusiast. Geared toward those who are passionate about photography.

Popular Photography A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Popular Photography

Popular Photography CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

Popular Photography Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Popular Photography

Incidents vs Photography Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popular Photography in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popular Photography in 2026.

Incident Types Popular Photography vs Photography Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popular Photography in 2026.

Incident History - Popular Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Popular Photography Subsidiaries

Popular Photography

Photography

Website: http://www.popphoto.com/

Company Size: 12

Recurrent VenturesOnline Audio and Video Media

FuturismOnline Audio and Video Media

Outdoor LifeMedia Production

DominoBook and Periodical Publishing

JancisRobinson.comWine & Spirits

Popular ScienceInternet News

DwellTechnology, Information and Internet

Task & PurposeInternet News

BobVila.comOnline Audio and Video Media

The DriveInternet News

Donut MediaEntertainment Providers

Car BiblesMotor Vehicle Manufacturing

We Are The MightyEntertainment Providers

The War ZoneTechnology, Information and Media

Loading…

Popular Photography Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Popular Photography CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-58281

SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281

CVE-2026-10660

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.4

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61870

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.4

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61861

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61858

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…