Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN companyPMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company
VS
Publix Super MarketsPublix Super Markets
PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company

PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company

Wiertnicza, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, undefined, PL

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pmi.pl
755/1000Fair

Being part of ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN we bring SCALE + IMPACT + UNIQUENESS to our Clients' sales and marketing solutions, we help them unlock untapped growth. *Privacy Policy: https://pmi.pl/polityka-mediow-spolecznosciowych

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Publix Super Markets

Publix Super Markets

3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Lakeland, 33811, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

Founded in 1930, Publix Super Markets is the largest and fastest-growing employee-owned supermarket chain in the United States. Publix employs over 200,000 associates. We are privately-owned, hold no long-term debt, have avoided layoffs, and continue to grow year after ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:85,657
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company

PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Publix Super Markets

Publix Super Markets

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Publix Super Markets in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Publix Super Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Publix Super Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company

PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Publix Super Markets

Publix Super Markets

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company company and Publix Super Markets company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company and Publix Super Markets, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company and Publix Super Markets, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company or Publix Super Markets ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company or Publix Super Markets ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company and Publix Super Markets, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PMICOMBERA an ADVANTAGE SMOLLAN company and Publix Super Markets, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2